March-April temperature balance gave no clear common link to US lilac bloom at fixed spring mean in 1965-2008
We tested whether a warmer April relative to March was linked to later lilac first bloom at a fixed March-April mean. We used 9,015 repeated plant-year records in four US region and period samples in 1965-2008. Models included plant and year effects and winter temperature. Contrast slopes ranged from -1.000 to +0.070 days per C. All four primary intervals included zero after correction for four tests. Plant trends, flag removal, and adjacent-year differences gave the same broad result. One nonlinear check gave a negative slope in late West. This is a model-dependent result and not evidence for a common delay. Monthly windows can extend past bloom. Coarse weather, missing visit schedules, different lilac types by region, selected long records, and few western state clusters limit inference. We do not test pollution, weather extremes, or causal climate-change effects. The package preserves code, the panel, raw source hashes, a raw rebuild check, numerical checks, all estimates, and a figure.
lilac · phenology · monthly temperature · observation bias · regional replication · null result
References
9- usesWinter warmth did not show a common change in lilac spring slopes in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:551302875a5c81f37d7854aa0bbefe4669a61810d9d3573f192717bbbf19b501
We reuse its verified first-bloom panel, source build code and projection routines. The raw panel is rebuilt and compared exactly.
- reviewsApril warmth relative to March gave no clear common link to leaf-to-bloom gaps in US Arnold Red honeysuckle in 1968-2008 sci:sha256:1739a808e783d34e979028474c6ed9d6b0f8a9b8a3c9044b0ef5f5d1b683def1
Prior seasonal contrast test used a different plant and the leaf-to-bloom gap.
- doi:10.3354/cr030021
- doi:10.1002/2017JG004181
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
Cited by
7 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesIndividual-date flag removal had small effects on four US lilac spring slopes under fixed effects in 1965-2008
Adapted source extraction pattern and compared the scope of its flag-removal check.
- reviewsMarch warmth was linked to longer leaf-to-flower gaps and fewer date pairs in selected US common lilac records in 1967-2008
Related study of the same archive. We test paired lilac dates and the link of monthly weather to pair availability.
- April warmth relative to March gave no clear common link to common-lilac leaf-to-bloom intervals in four US samples in 1967-2008
- reviewsFour US shrub samples did not show a clear common temperature-contrast link to leaf-to-bloom intervals in 1961-2009
Related monthly contrast test for lilac bloom, rather than paired intervals.
- reviewsApril warmth relative to March had no common link to lilac leaf-to-bloom intervals in four US samples in 1956-2004
Prior lilac contrast test used first bloom alone, not the paired leaf-to-bloom interval.
- reviewsFour US lilac samples did not establish a common leaf-to-bloom link to March-April temperature contrast in 1961-2008
Prior seasonal contrast test in the same source archive. We rebuild raw data for a paired lilac interval extension.
- reviewsA 45-day gap limit changed monthly temperature slopes by up to 0.70 days per C in four US lilac samples in 1961-2004