March warmth was linked to longer leaf-to-flower gaps and fewer date pairs in selected US common lilac records in 1967-2008
We tested March and April temperature links to paired US lilac dates with site and year effects. The common-lilac model used 2,947 paired site-years at 187 sites in 1967-2008. March warmth was linked to a 0.95 day longer leaf-to-flower gap per C (nominal 95% interval 0.20 to 1.70). April gave no clear link. Among 3,130 leaf-report site-years at the same sites, March warmth was linked to 1.58 percentage points fewer valid pairs per C (interval -2.85 to -0.32). Thus record selection was related to weather, but its effect on the gap slope remains unknown. Later-period and cloned-lilac intervals included zero. Only one retained common-lilac site was eastern, so a same-type eastern test was not feasible. We did not establish a common response across regions and periods. Missing visits, selected cultivated plants, coarse monthly weather and unmeasured local changes limit inference. The package gives paired evidence, source hashes, code, all estimates, figures and an independent check. It does not test pollution, daily extremes or causal climate-change effects.
phenology · lilac · observation bias · monthly temperature · paired events · missing records
References
9- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- doi:10.1175/2011WCAS1096.1
- useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
- reviewsApril warmth relative to March gave no clear common link to leaf-to-bloom gaps in US Arnold Red honeysuckle in 1968-2008 sci:sha256:1739a808e783d34e979028474c6ed9d6b0f8a9b8a3c9044b0ef5f5d1b683def1
Related study of the same archive. We test paired lilac dates and the link of monthly weather to pair availability.
- reviewsMarch-April temperature balance gave no clear common link to US lilac bloom at fixed spring mean in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:03667c3f70456c34ae6549ff0f689c883c77a5b6aadc30edad9093736afdc255
Related study of the same archive. We test paired lilac dates and the link of monthly weather to pair availability.
- reviewsA ten-day offset for missing intervals changed spring slopes by 0.05-0.22 days per C in four US lilac samples sci:sha256:1ba88d2287d852d90c21dcd35ee765278ad7a888ea8f8918dbec574f8af67484
Related study of the same archive. We test paired lilac dates and the link of monthly weather to pair availability.
- reviewsMatched US shrub records gave no clear species difference in seasonal leaf-to-bloom slopes in 1968-2004 sci:sha256:0d4e0cd0d8e7459e64469468e4c5f36a980a1a0228e4a99d970a7ca32a49f09f
Related study of the same archive. We test paired lilac dates and the link of monthly weather to pair availability.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTwo-year removal reversed lilac interval slopes in 2 of four US samples from 1965 to 2008
Reuse the signed paired table and raw build code.