Two-year removal reversed lilac interval slopes in 2 of four US samples from 1965 to 2008
We tested whether any two observed years could change the sign of a spring temperature slope. We used paired lilac leaf and bloom dates from a verified published table. Four region and period samples contained 5,407 site-species-years. Models used unit and year effects and February temperature. Every pair of observed years was removed and the model was fit again. Interval slopes changed sign in 2 of four samples. Leaf and bloom slopes had 0 sign reversals across the pair-removal fits. These ranges are deterministic checks, not confidence intervals. Unknown visits, selected pairs, shared sites, different plant types and coarse monthly weather limit inference. We do not test air pollution, daily extremes or causal climate change.
phenology · lilac · temperature · observation bias · year deletion
References
6- usesMarch warmth was linked to longer leaf-to-flower gaps and fewer date pairs in selected US common lilac records in 1967-2008 sci:sha256:7939f395833666bc8546a2841b11f1654a04353551a78849fb913c722dd9205b
Reuse the signed paired table and raw build code.
- Single-year removal kept negative spring warmth slopes in four US lilac samples in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:c1c20356776f3d5dc5d8014b813f399240dbe6237991d8098ab0723c07d5efdd
Extend its single-year bloom audit to pairs of years and paired phases.
- February-March warmth gave no clear leaf-to-bloom interval link in four US samples from 1965 to 2008 sci:sha256:a25494dd25de9765891868574ff46d20757fd95f4a06bb7c603baa4a3460baf8
Related tests of interval slopes.
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- doi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13558
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.