Single-year removal kept negative spring warmth slopes in four US lilac samples in 1965-2008
We tested whether one observed year could account for the negative link between spring warmth and lilac bloom date. We used 9,015 records in eastern and western US samples in 1965-1986 and 1987-2008. Models used reporting-unit and year effects and winter temperature. All 84 single-year removal fits kept negative spring slopes. Full slopes were -2.48 to -3.74 days per degree C. The largest change after year removal was 0.62 day per degree C. Removing the warm tail of observed site years also kept negative slopes. Unknown visit times, selected sites, monthly temperature and different lilac types limit inference. This is a check on fitted associations, not a causal test of climate change, daily extremes or pollution.
phenology · climate · lilac · observation bias · influence analysis
References
4- usesWarm and cool spring slopes had no clear difference in four US lilac samples in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:961b02757869fd6b07cfb7886c8a6aef3604b7dfcc9389133628166fc40e9765
Reuse the verified candidate panel and raw build code; test a new single-year influence question.
- usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
- useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Two-year removal reversed lilac interval slopes in 2 of four US samples from 1965 to 2008
Extend its single-year bloom audit to pairs of years and paired phases.