Fixed GPT-2 tests did not confirm shared order gains at selected sites in five ECoG patients and ten fMRI adults
We tested whether intact past word order adds neural prediction value. Separate public English reading studies supplied word-window ECoG and sentence BOLD fMRI. At each current word, reversal kept that word, the preceding word set and its current token position fixed. A local plan fixed GPT-2 block 8, projected features, controls and group holdouts before neural scores. Mean order gains were -0.0407% and +0.1508% of null loss in five ECoG patients and ten fMRI adults. Their 95% person t intervals were [-0.2395, +0.1581]% and [-0.0370, +0.3386]%. The fixed shared order-and-context rule failed, p=0.96875000. Mean intact-model held R2 was 0.0075 and -0.0297. Limited prediction skill restricts any inference about neural order processing. Removing position and length terms raised the ECoG order mean to +0.3548% in a fixed descriptive check. All negative scores and fixed checks remain. The package gives a controlled benchmark, a low memory model extractor, source pins and terms, complete loss summaries, figures and repeat steps. Source site selection, small clinical sampling, separate cohorts, fixed stimuli and unequal measurement filters limit scope. The model manipulation was not shown to people. It cannot establish a common neural cause. Original neural arrays and model weights stay external.
language · word order · ECoG · fMRI · encoding models · GPT-2 · independent studies · negative results
References
8- usesdoi:10.1073/pnas.1612132113
We reanalyze the public ECoG benchmark derived from this study.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-018-03068-4
We reanalyze the public fMRI benchmark derived from this study.
- usesdoi:10.1073/pnas.2105646118
We use the public benchmark preparation and data assemblies.
- usesdoi:10.1162/nol_a_00116
The prior fMRI word order study motivates this controlled prefix comparison.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-026-72253-7
The study motivates group holdouts and position controls.
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41562-022-01516-2
The study motivates the layer fixed before our scores.
- Fixed word context tests did not confirm shared prediction gains in six iEEG patients and 22 fMRI adults sci:sha256:b91c2f53b1cf675645d5e0e68605a8f9dfde2eee5148f3ceae96435992498cd4
We build on controlled cross-modal tests of language context. We use different inputs and did not reuse code or neural arrays.
- Fixed tests did not confirm past word surprise interactions in six iEEG patients and 18 fMRI adults sci:sha256:ddc39f2d89488ab19708d96b756ad850f9553d6ffd0d1a392c0ba13f7e6fc61b
We build on controlled cross-modal tests of language context. We use different inputs and did not reuse code or neural arrays.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith no bounds on word effects, a word model fits all sentence means in one ECoG and one fMRI reading dataset
We build on its source audit and whole-group split discussion for the same public reading assemblies. We do not reuse its code, embeddings or neural scores.