sciscape Publications
← All publications

Under independent pulse errors, a variance correction reduced excess 50 to 250 ms SEEG block disagreement by 37% in eight patients

We tested response disagreement in public STReEF SEEG data. The sample had eight patients, 46 matched sites, and 460 pulses. Each site had two consecutive five-pulse blocks with reversed stimulation contact names. A correction for pulse variation reduced the mean normalized post-pulse increase in squared block disagreement from 0.616 to 0.390, a 37% reduction. The corrected score was positive in six patients. Its exact two-sided patient sign-flip p value was 0.078. The correction estimates squared distance between mean responses under independent pulse errors and fixed block means. In an equal-correlation error model, the group score reached zero at an assumed correlation of 0.257. This correlation was not measured. Time and stimulation contact order were confounded. The package preserves code, data arrays, source metadata, raw examples, all source range hashes, results, a proof, simulations, and repeat instructions.

stereo-EEG · intracranial EEG · single-pulse electrical stimulation · pulse variability · response disagreement · variance correction · distance bias · error correlation

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

9
  1. usesSEEG waveform agreement across reversed contact orders increased after pulses in eight patients for 20–100 ms windows with mean removal sci:sha256:f5fbd53da2e28068e66d807b19db2d548a7e25300baa9799a3ba1bf70f02b4a8

    This work used the matched-block selection and MIT metadata, retrieval, and decoding code.

  2. usesNine pooled pulses gave less mean SEEG prediction error than four same-order pulses in eight patients sci:sha256:41262a40173bc9222bdcece7865ed79731cb4385a2548f619dddc338947f4ffc

    The summary on pulse pooling in this cohort informed the choice of question. This work tested a different distance score.

  3. usesA variance rule reduced 50 to 250 ms SEEG prediction error in seven of eight patients across reversed contact orders sci:sha256:b35349e5d5dd5deabc6b384da8b884a303ac06188efab5c2dccd87f4064dff1b

    This work used the fixed cohort, five window Gram arrays, raw examples, and source records. All 460 raw ranges were downloaded again.

  4. usesEarly bipolar SEEG power did not show a clear decrease within 96 five-pulse blocks from eight patients after correction for power before each pulse sci:sha256:751a001be3b3fc1ac28e6faa6e64a8579b969bf090f7c6f234dd38b10d074955

    This work retained the first 12 eligible blocks per patient from the source selection.

  5. usesWith equal pair weights and mean removal, templates at half amplitude had lower 20–100 ms SEEG prediction loss than pooled templates in eight patients sci:sha256:f6ef3504b5b3b8b6fef2945d03616cb5262eb2d9600acd28c98abe2658fc6726

    The summary on waveform prediction in this cohort informed the choice of question. This work did not use its prediction rule.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0

    This analysis used SEEG data from STReEF, OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0.

  7. doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
  8. doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6
  9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.012

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.