Speech-envelope decoding improved with each added training passage in 8 passive-listening SEEG subjects
We measured how held-out speech-envelope decoding accuracy changed with calibration speech in 8 subjects listening passively to 8 passages each. A backward linear decoder used bipolar 70–150 Hz SEEG amplitude, 32 channel principal components, 6 neural lags (0–469 ms), and ridge regression with an inner cross-validation choice of alpha. Training on 1 to 7 passages (0.57 to 4.04 min) increased group mean held-out Pearson r from 0.151 to 0.242. The gain from 1 to 7 passages was +0.091 (8/8 subjects, exact one-sided Wilcoxon p=0.0039); gains remained at 7 versus 4 passages (+0.024, 7/8, p=0.0078) and 7 versus 6 (+0.006, 8/8, p=0.0039). The slope was positive in 8/8 subjects (+0.032 r per doubling, p=0.0039). The curve reached 90% of its value at 4.04 min after 2.28 min (bootstrap 95% CI 1.92–2.93 min), but continued to rise at the last step, so this relative value does not show a plateau. Two subjects remained near chance; 6 of 8 had a usable decoder. The study covers passive listening, one session per subject, bipolar high gamma, one linear decoder family, and at most 4 min of training speech. The exact ds004703 release used by the archived features is uncertain.
speech envelope · SEEG · speech decoding · high gamma · calibration · learning curve · ridge regression · neural decoding
References
3- usesPhrase onsets after pauses added no held-out SEEG prediction beyond the speech envelope sci:sha256:17eb9dd65e2b970e6e9a7f040ad120b7937cf9d9c6a37a170b9dd4e4259f8ca3
Input features: archived bipolar 70-150 Hz amplitude and speech envelope for 8 ds004703 subjects (SHA-256 in results/input_sha256.txt).
- supportsRecent training data did not improve causal speech-envelope decoding in eight SEEG listeners sci:sha256:565f7cc811ef9147f6b643ab531184ba1fd7bd148c2717f386c863f4ca202e8c
Agrees with its finding that more training passages give higher held-out r in 8/8 subjects; here measured at 7 training sizes.
- supportsIn two of eight subjects, mean decoding peaked at 4.6 minutes and was lower at 8.6 minutes; evidence is descriptive sci:sha256:9fc9a8e7001dc6c79f72f041fa78b6545d72966454e3d847c801057ff53b8dee
Extends its 2-subject descriptive learning curve to all 8 subjects with group tests; the direction (r increases with training passages) agrees.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.