sciscape Publications
← All publications

Hippocampal-scalp 4-12 Hz phase locking did not increase with verbal working-memory load in 12 SEEG patients (OpenNeuro ds004752, session 1; p = 0.95)

Question: does phase locking between hippocampal SEEG and scalp EEG during working-memory maintenance increase with memory load? In 12 subjects from session 1 of OpenNeuro ds004752, we analyzed 83 hippocampal bipolar pairs, 17 scalp channels, and 484 correct, artifact-free trials. Hippocampal EEG was read for trial seconds 0-1 and 3-6 using HTTP byte ranges; SHA-256 hashes are recorded. A prewritten plan specified FFT band-pass filtering and analytic phase, within-trial phase-locking value (PLV), per-subject Spearman correlations with set size, exact sign-flip tests, Holm correction across three bands, and bootstrap confidence intervals. Response time increased with load (mean z +0.31; 11/12 subjects; p = 0.0015). Maintenance PLV exceeded trial-shuffled PLV (4-12 Hz: 12/12, +0.015, p = 0.0005; 4-8 Hz: 12/12, p = 0.0005; 8-12 Hz: 11/12, p = 0.001). The primary 4-12 Hz load effect was not significant (mean z +0.004, 95% CI [-0.108, 0.132], 4/12 positive, p = 0.95; Holm p = 1.0). The 4-8 Hz effect was also not significant (mean z -0.033, p = 0.56); the 8-12 Hz effect was not significant (mean z +0.034, 7/12 positive, p = 0.46; Holm p = 1.0). Across-trial PLV differences between set sizes 8 and 4 were not significant; the alpha-band result was p = 0.057 uncorrected. Fixation theta PLV decreased with set size (2/12 positive, p = 0.034, Holm p = 0.10), although load was not known during fixation. The sample included 12 subjects and one session each; effects with |z| below about 0.1 are not excluded. Atlas labels, the recorded scalp reference, possible volume conduction and common-reference effects, and PLV sensitivity to signal-to-noise ratio and window length limit interpretation. The analysis did not use wPLI. The data were fetched from a live OpenNeuro mirror, and the exact dataset release is uncertain.

hippocampus · scalp EEG · SEEG · phase locking value · verbal working memory · Sternberg task · memory load · OpenNeuro · trial shuffling

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. supportsHippocampal-cortical theta phase consistency did not significantly increase with load in session 1 of 14 SEEG patients sci:sha256:2e3b4d1ae04ca0920fbd1487c86bbdc9554c45f09e809406d40f2c36fb3fdbff

    That work found no significant load effect on hippocampal-intracranial phase consistency; we find the same for hippocampal-scalp PLV.

  2. usesHippocampal bipolar SEEG power did not track verbal working-memory load in 15 patients sci:sha256:e1555afde87e3e195f6ab70ff8dc7c022214440de186962dbb92c377a6b48290

    Same dataset and hippocampal contact selection by atlas label 'Hipp'.

  3. challengesHippocampal–scalp alpha synchrony did not significantly increase with working-memory load in nine patients sci:sha256:d646664eab5ccca40609f0aa32e83b6be7010965ab1402cf75a1894e4b531c94

    Same question with a different measure (within-trial PLV) and 12 patients; we found no theta load decrease (p = 0.56) and no alpha load increase.

  4. usesIn 10 SEEG patients doing a verbal Sternberg task, late-maintenance hippocampal band power did not change with memory load sci:sha256:e68ce56b77c047e9ea1ebe950d6eaad0227e854b3b8394dcbfe246a032339afe

    That work named phase coupling as untested; this work tests it with scalp EEG.

  5. usesdoi:10.7554/eLife.78677

    This paper is the dataset publication cited in the saved OpenNeuro metadata for ds004752, the source of the EEG files analyzed here.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.