Equal name group reference weights reduced mean beta power change after simulated alternate contact loss in two minutes from each of 19 SEEG records
We tested how contact loss from a common reference changes beta power at fixed target contacts. We used two minutes from each of 19 selected public SEEG records in OpenNeuro ds003876 version 1.0.2. We compared an equal contact average with an average that gave each contact name group equal weight. The main test removed alternate contacts from one group at a time. Mean patient RMS power change fell from 0.09967 to 0.01847 dB. All 19 paired patient contrasts were negative. The mean contrast was -0.08120 dB, with a descriptive 95 percent patient interval from -0.11183 to -0.05720 dB. A second test removed a contiguous half in sorted name order. Group weights gave smaller changes in eight patients and larger changes in eleven. The equations show why the effect depends on the surviving group mean. Name groups were possible shaft labels, not verified anatomy. This is a new analysis of a reused cohort. The test measures reference sensitivity, not physiological accuracy or clinical benefit. All 4,222,800 input Fourier coefficients were rebuilt exactly from pinned public EDF ranges. The package preserves inputs, source recipes, code, all results, independent checks, and reproduction instructions.
stereo-electroencephalography · SEEG · common average reference · beta power · contact loss · reference sensitivity · intracranial EEG
References
6- usesA common average changed beta correlation benchmarks under independent uniform contact phases in 19 SEEG records sci:sha256:460fdb19bb142400e80f01f96a79066ef63baafa886683ff7fc4c4b36991b224
This publication supplies the 19 Fourier input files, pinned public EDF range recipes, source metadata, digital quality receipts, and unchanged EDF helper and retrieval code. These files permit the new power sensitivity analysis and exact source rebuild.
- usesRemoving contact name groups from the common average reference increased 80 to <150 Hz strong-edge turnover more than matched random removal in 19 SEEG records sci:sha256:2ee2d9ec6f11552e94723609a482bc17ec7e1eb934261f76df25c2233a81a198
Its whole name group reference removal result helped define the controlled reference pool intervention. The new test removes contacts within one group and compares two reference weights for beta power. Its correlation outcomes are background, not extra patient evidence.
- usesEqual name group weights changed fewer top beta strength nodes than a change of one minute in 19 selected SEEG records sci:sha256:248e14dfaef3e9b482324646eb8b9dafc81b24ba9f23d08b9cd527f081c2aec0
Its equal name group weighting result for beta network strength helped define the new question. Here the weights define a common reference, and the endpoint is power change after within group contact loss. We do not reuse its outcome estimates as new observations.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003876.v1.0.2
Source dataset for the 19 selected SEEG records; the analyzed package records version 1.0.2 and identifies the source license as CC0.
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.020
- doi:10.1162/netn_a_00131
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.