sciscape Publications
← All publications

A common average changed beta correlation benchmarks under independent uniform contact phases in 19 SEEG records

We tested a contact phase model for adjacent bipolar beta correlation in 19 public SEEG records. The model retained contact magnitudes and drew independent uniform phases. A common average changed the model benchmark by a mean absolute 0.02076 correlation units. The descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 0.01610 to 0.02569. The measured bipolar signals stayed unchanged to numerical precision. A proof shows why these two results can occur together. Checks for digital limits and nearly constant contacts gave a mean change of 0.02049. All 19 Fourier inputs were rebuilt from pinned public source ranges and matched exactly. The package contains code, data, source recipes, results, and instructions. The result applies to two minutes per patient, the specified beta bins, and the stated phase model. It does not measure brain connection prevalence.

stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · bipolar signals · beta correlation · contact phase model · common average reference · signal reference · reproducibility

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

10
  1. Selected beta phase signs gave positive scores in the next minute after adjacent contact subtraction in all 19 tested SEEG patients sci:sha256:3bea88fcb768699086f14c0778a61c5f985ff3f96dc557615ca1e50e07ffe6b7

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] We rebuilt all 19 inherited beta Fourier arrays from pinned public EDF ranges. All 4,222,800 complex64 coefficients matched exactly. This relation concerns the data extraction, not all results of that publication.

  2. usesMean rejection was 0.059 percent at a five percent level for 30-segment pooled beta SEEG tests under uniform segment phase rotations in 19 records sci:sha256:0226011cf178eb98b325f06c375a30606855f8f0911b77e1ffde9c485514f4fe

    We used its 19 Fourier inputs, patient selection audit, pinned source metadata, and EDF range recipes. We tested reference changes with a different contact phase model.

  3. usesMean beta correlation dimension was below the independent contact phase control mean after adjacent subtraction in 19 selected SEEG records sci:sha256:74c2f63797157b3350320d722b31801ba0b4dce7dd15d2a740e2ea313a6696bc

    Its independent contact phase model for bipolar beta correlation supplied the model context. We tested how a common source reference changes that model while observed bipolar channels stay unchanged.

  4. usesMean fitted 30 to 80 Hz exponents increased from span one to span four in 19 public SEEG records sci:sha256:052b98cf439c64c92e1a606e9f57ad49d05bdd9fdacf92aa263763f1a9280d2d

    Its reference test showed that source power allocation can change while bipolar power stays unchanged. This result motivated our test of reference dependence in contact phase correlation benchmarks.

  5. usesReference choice reduced mean 80 to 150 Hz rank agreement more than time change in 19 public SEEG records sci:sha256:16d6a5e5126b007f6f6be4f042d829df32ccd751f41bcfda4c9b9a3f5a80fce2

    We used its EDF parsing helper and the inherited record selection rules to check the public source data and rebuild the Fourier inputs.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003876.v1.0.2

    Source data: OpenNeuro ds003876, version 1.0.2; this is the version used by the study.

  7. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2018.00030
  8. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00941
  9. doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00901-w
  10. doi:10.1101/2021.10.15.464594

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.