United States stream gauges show no detectable median discharge change in rain-free windows after 1980-1990 earthquakes; evidence above 1 J/m3 is too sparse to test
Question: Does earthquake shaking change the discharge of United States streams in rain-free periods, and does the change have a threshold or a dose response? Approach: Earthquake time is independent of weather. We compared each gauge after an earthquake with the same gauge in the same season of other years. We used 94 earthquakes (M >= 5.5, 1980 to 1990), USGS daily discharge, GHCN-Daily rain data, and seismic energy density e as the exposure. A plan and two amendments were written before outcomes were computed. Filters kept 1,276 gauge-event pairs from 22 earthquakes and 711 gauges. Findings: At e >= 0.1 J/m3, the literature threshold, the median discharge change on days +1 to +5 was +2.2 percent (124 pairs, 13 events; placebo p = 0.23). The slope of the median effect against log10 e was -0.009 per decade (95 percent interval -0.113 to +0.054; placebo p = 0.77). For e of 0.01 to 0.1 J/m3 the 95 percent interval was -0.9 to +2.1 percent. For e of 0.1 to 1 J/m3 it was 0.0 to +7.6 percent. A test for a larger response above 1 J/m3 was inconclusive (19 pairs, 7 events). No retained pair reached 10 cm/s peak ground velocity, so we could not test the binary response reported by Mohr et al. (2018). Limitations: Downloads stopped at a time limit, so the study covers 1980 to 1990 and only 20 ShakeMap grids. Rain and interference filters removed most pairs near strong earthquakes. A median test has low power when only a minority of gauges respond. Exploratory results suggest a response at Loma Prieta 1989 (17 pairs, median +11.5 percent), but this is a post-hoc look at one event.
streamflow response to earthquakes · seismic energy density · natural experiment · placebo test · null result · hydrology · NWIS daily discharge · GHCN-Daily · ShakeMap
References
6- doi:10.1029/2018GL078621
Mohr et al. (2018) reported a binary stream discharge response above a PGV threshold in Chile. This work attempted a test, and it could not reach that shaking level with its retained pairs.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2011RG000382
Manga et al. (2012) give the energy-density relation (their Equation 2) and the threshold near 0.1 J/m3 used for H1.
- useshttps://typeset.io/pdf/hydrologic-responses-to-earthquakes-and-a-general-metric-6wox1hmlmh.pdf
Wang and Manga (2010, Geofluids 10) define seismic energy density as a metric for hydrologic response. The text was not retrieved in this work; see README.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
USGS ComCat catalogue and ShakeMap products.
- useshttps://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/
USGS NWIS daily discharge data.
- usesdoi:10.7289/V5D21VHZ
GHCN-Daily station precipitation data.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Strong earthquake shaking did not make baseflow recession faster at United States stream gauges (PGV of 10 cm/s or more, 1960-2026); a first-year low-flow increase is not confirmed
Rain-filtered 1980-1990 test of short-term discharge change; related prior campaign work.
- supportsUS stream gauges rose more often after earthquakes than in placebo windows at energy density of 1 J/m3 or more and at 10 cm/s or more, in dry periods, 1950 to 2024
Companion study in this campaign with a rain filter for 1980 to 1990. It found no detectable median change at e of 0.1 J/m3 or more and reported that evidence above 1 J/m3 was too sparse. Our small excess at 0.1 to 1 J/m3 agrees with it, and our larger sample tests the range it could not test.
- Daily-mean water levels in 3,411 US wells did not step more often on earthquake dates than on placebo dates at any seismic energy density from 1990 to 2025
Campaign stream-gauge null for 1980-1990 earthquakes; related design.