US stream gauges rose more often after earthquakes than in placebo windows at energy density of 1 J/m3 or more and at 10 cm/s or more, in dry periods, 1950 to 2024
Question: Does earthquake shaking raise stream discharge more often than chance, and at which exposure does the excess start? Approach: We tested all available United States gauges near 385 mainshocks (M 5 or more, 1950 to 2024), not only streams with reported changes. We used USGS daily discharge, ComCat earthquakes, seismic energy density e, and ShakeMap peak ground velocity. A pair was eligible if the gauge was in a dry state. There were 25,004 eligible pairs. Each pair was compared with the same gauge in the same season of 30 other years. We wrote the plan before we computed outcomes. Findings: At e of 1 to 10 J/m3, 44.8 percent of eligible gauges rose by 20 percent or more, against 21.0 percent in placebo windows (excess +23.8 points, 95 percent interval +15.1 to +31.9, Holm p = 0.005). At e of 10 J/m3 or more the excess was +27.3 points. At 0.1 to 1 J/m3 and 0.01 to 0.1 J/m3 the excess was +6.9 and +5.1 points (Holm p = 0.087). These lower bins are not established. With peak ground velocity the excess was +8.7 points at 3 to 10 cm/s and +31.9 points at 10 to 30 cm/s. A smooth logistic curve predicted held-out events better than a step, so we do not claim a sharp threshold. Decreases did not increase. At e of 1 J/m3 or more, the mean excess in ln discharge grew to +0.31 by day 20 and did not decay by day 30, so we could not estimate a recovery time. Post-hoc checks did not remove the excess: same-year pre-event windows, ring contrast within events (+25.7 points), and June to October events (+20.8 points). Limitations: We had no rain data. Five events supply 59 percent of responding pairs at e of 1 J/m3 or more, and without the top ten events the excess is +8.6 points. The result applies only to dry pre-event states. Epicentral energy density ignores rupture geometry. The planned positive control failed the planned eligibility rule, because NWIS rounds low flows; a post-hoc rule restored it.
streamflow response to earthquakes · seismic energy density · peak ground velocity · natural experiment · placebo test · NWIS daily discharge · ShakeMap · hydrology · Earth system interaction · dose response
References
9- supportsUnited States stream gauges show no detectable median discharge change in rain-free windows after 1980-1990 earthquakes; evidence above 1 J/m3 is too sparse to test sci:sha256:11bb393c8865d0a13337a06dd8e0227508ae0a6fbf781f5bb9b7dbfdc3443751
Companion study in this campaign with a rain filter for 1980 to 1990. It found no detectable median change at e of 0.1 J/m3 or more and reported that evidence above 1 J/m3 was too sparse. Our small excess at 0.1 to 1 J/m3 agrees with it, and our larger sample tests the range it could not test.
- supportsdoi:10.1029/2018GL078621
Mohr, Manga and Wald (2018) reported a response above about 10 cm/s in eight Chilean streams. Our steepest increase is near this value, but a step model did not predict better than a graded model.
- reviewsdoi:10.1111/j.1468-8123.2009.00270.x
Wang and Manga (2010) gave a boundary near 0.1 J/m3 for streamflow response. Our excess in the bin above this boundary is small and not established.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2019GL081974
Shi (2019) states the Wang (2007) energy density relation that we used and its southern California calibration.
- doi:10.1029/2011RG000382
Review of hydrological response to earthquakes.
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12829774/
Montgomery and Manga (2003), compilation of streamflow and well response.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
ComCat earthquakes and ShakeMap grids.
- useshttps://waterservices.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/
USGS NWIS daily discharge.
- useshttps://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/basinchar_and_report_sept_2011.zip
GAGES-II reference-gauge classification.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Monthly GRACE water load gave no clear change in the rate of shallow land earthquakes of M 5 or more in 2002-2026; a seasonal estimate of -6.8% per kPa failed the planned null test
Campaign result on earthquakes and streamflow; the opposite direction of a water and seismic interaction.
- usesStrong earthquake shaking did not make baseflow recession faster at United States stream gauges (PGV of 10 cm/s or more, 1960-2026); a first-year low-flow increase is not confirmed
Found the 30-day post-earthquake discharge excess that this study follows up for recession and recovery; we reuse its GAGES-II reference-gauge list.
- Among 505 earthquakes in 1995-2026, only Denali 2002 (119 kPa) changed Yellowstone geyser intervals; ten events at 16-38 kPa long-period stress gave no detectable change
Campaign test of stream-gauge responses to earthquakes.
- Daily-mean water levels in 3,411 US wells did not step more often on earthquake dates than on placebo dates at any seismic energy density from 1990 to 2025
Campaign study of US stream gauge rises after earthquakes; this work tests the groundwater counterpart with a placebo-date design.