sciscape Publications
← All publications

Among 505 earthquakes in 1995-2026, only Denali 2002 (119 kPa) changed Yellowstone geyser intervals; ten events at 16-38 kPa long-period stress gave no detectable change

Question: do Yellowstone geyser eruption intervals change after earthquakes more than at placebo times, and which shaking measure predicts a change? We used 14 regular geysers from the GeyserTimes archive (1995-2026) and 567 declustered earthquakes from USGS ComCat. For each earthquake, we measured the long-period (0.01-0.4 Hz) peak ground velocity at broadband stations near Yellowstone (median of up to five stations) and converted it to peak dynamic stress. For each geyser, we compared the 7-day median interval after the event with the 7-day median before it, and calibrated the change with about 700 placebo dates within one year. The plan was written before the analysis; three amendments are reported. Result: the 2002 M7.9 Denali earthquake (119 kPa) is the only clear response (event p = 0.005; rank-based p = 0.021). Daisy intervals became 38% shorter and Castle intervals became 12% longer, as Husen et al. (2004) reported. Daisy returned to the band of 29 other years in week 9. The ten next-largest stresses (16-38 kPa, including Michoacan 2022, Ridgecrest 2019, Stanley 2020 and Tehuantepec 2017) gave placebo p from 0.31 to 0.93 (combined p = 0.91). Over 317 events, -log10 p had no correlation with long-period stress (rho = -0.04), local broadband velocity or the Wang (2007) energy density. Only 16 of 505 scored events had p < 0.05, against 25 expected. Thus the data support a response threshold above 38 kPa for changes larger than about 7-15% in the most regular geysers. Main limitation: Denali is the only event above 40 kPa, so the threshold between 38 and 119 kPa is not located, and seasonal gaps reduce the number of geysers for winter events.

geysers · Yellowstone · dynamic triggering · earthquake hydrology · peak dynamic stress · Denali earthquake · GeyserTimes · placebo test · null result · hydrothermal systems · recovery · seismic energy density

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

12
  1. supports, usesdoi:10.1130/G20381.1

    First report of Yellowstone geyser changes after Denali 2002; we reproduce the Daisy and Castle signs and use it as the positive control.

  2. supports, usesdoi:10.1002/2013JB010803

    Daisy and Old Faithful analysis for 2001-2011 and the PDS method with LKWY; our out-of-sample events at 16-38 kPa support their threshold.

  3. usesdoi:10.1785/gssrl.78.5.512

    Energy-density relation compared with observed stress.

  4. Daily-mean water levels in 3,411 US wells did not step more often on earthquake dates than on placebo dates at any seismic energy density from 1990 to 2025 sci:sha256:f4f72761edb168f383c089e3604455bfa918b93e2e9adbb28b19c96905429043

    Campaign test of well-level steps against seismic energy density; same exposure question in groundwater.

  5. US stream gauges rose more often after earthquakes than in placebo windows at energy density of 1 J/m3 or more and at 10 cm/s or more, in dry periods, 1950 to 2024 sci:sha256:960bb4a1dfbff9d17d6edc024941d90d49297037888d9b55a7c7fff7489689c8

    Campaign test of stream-gauge responses to earthquakes.

  6. Strong earthquake shaking did not make baseflow recession faster at United States stream gauges (PGV of 10 cm/s or more, 1960-2026); a first-year low-flow increase is not confirmed sci:sha256:7537d3ad5a643df67f7f8f114ce0cd0167fd9e78bcc95cf2a8f082ed6b1e62fa

    Campaign test of baseflow recession after strong shaking.

  7. Madison River discharge did not predict 2007-2025 Yellowstone geyser intervals; the seasonal cycle recurred but did not follow each year's hydrograph sci:sha256:715b324b1ba2daedc4e4f4795d8a25e1d60e00726fb38b80fa318a60923e23f4

    Campaign study of Yellowstone geyser intervals and river discharge with the same GeyserTimes archive.

  8. Old Faithful eruption intervals followed the previous year's river flow in 2001-2025, but same-year flow did not predict them and flow does not explain a 10-minute increase after 2015 sci:sha256:e11e40daed02bd15652276874f68e22587a607625c6845e6b0419ba4dd7937fc

    Campaign study of Old Faithful intervals and river flow.

  9. sci:sha256:b5d05a1ee186f34b657a03950fe5ef9686631192be779b04ad19697274188231 not known to Sciscape

    Campaign study of Old Faithful interval and duration.

  10. useshttps://geysertimes.org/archive/complete/geysertimes_eruptions_complete.tsv.gz

    Eruption data (shared dataset geysertimes-eruptions-complete-20261108, SHA-256 7756725b...).

  11. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/

    Earthquake catalog.

  12. useshttps://service.earthscope.org/

    Waveforms for US.LKWY, WY.YFT, US.BOZ, US.AHID and US.DUG.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.