Five-pulse averages passed a SEEG shape check more often than individual pulses at selected readouts in eight patient sessions
This secondary test used public SEEG data from eight patients with epilepsy. An early five-pulse check selected 196 of 886 stimulation-to-readout pairs. With equal patient weights, the later five-pulse average passed a waveform shape check at 94.5%, and individual later pulses passed at 66.4%. The mean gap was 28.2 percentage points (95% patient bootstrap interval, 16.6 to 39.9; paired sign-flip p = 0.0078). All five individual pulses passed at 41.1% of selected pairs. The test used separate early and later good pulses in the same session, a fixed early template, and a correlation threshold of 0.8 over 20 to 500 ms. The result supports separate checks for individual responses in brain interface research. It does not establish neural origin, online control, or safe stimulation. The package includes exact trial products, pulse results, code, source hashes, figures, and reproduction steps.
SEEG · electrical stimulation · single-pulse responses · waveform reproducibility · brain-computer interfaces
References
4- usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f
The exact trial products, chronological source indices, contact rules, and early five-pulse selection rule enabled the later individual-pulse test. The new result keeps the prior mean-waveform outcome and compares it with individual final pulses.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
This exact OpenNeuro release supplied the public SEEG source waveforms and metadata used in the analysis.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
This is the source study for the public limbic single-pulse stimulation recordings analyzed here.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.