A five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions

1. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

   The study analyzed single-trial SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004696, version 1.0.1.

2. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
3. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

• usesEnergy showed no clear AUC gain over waveform matching at 200–500 ms with early pair calibration in eight SEEG sessions

  This study inherits the pair eligibility rules and pulse-row mapping. The original extraction code is preserved.

• usesA prior voltage model did not reduce mean forecast error for 20–500 ms pulse size at later sites in eight SEEG sessions

  This study used the initial adjacent-contact selection rules and source extraction method. These rules defined the fixed clinical SEEG readouts.

• usesA fixed joint SEEG model increased mean normalized error compared with separate scaling after five calibration pulses at 20–500 ms in eight sessions

  We used the original rules for good pulses, constant current, remote adjacent bipolar readouts, and the first five and final five pulses. The checked archive carried these selections forward. We did not change selection in response to the new spatial results.

• usesEarly RMS did not lower mean late SEEG forecast error in fixed linear models with five calibration pulses per site in eight patient sessions

  We used its adjacent bipolar readout definitions, source extraction design, and calibration shape check.

• usesThe test did not detect a positive time relation for SEEG waveform distance at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions under log count control and joint pulse exchangeability

  We used its public-source retrieval and extraction code. We also used its source-code records and pinned file hashes.

• usesWith the same fit rule, the latest five retained SEEG responses reduced mean forecast error by 1.1 percent against random sets of five at 20 to 500 ms in eight patient sessions

  The adjacent bipolar selection, chronological first-and-final pulse extraction, and source retrieval method originated in this record. They were inherited through the direct forecast parent without new outcome-based selection.

• usesA centered 1 s 4–10 Hz phase filter predicted random response sizes in a simulation with SEEG from eight patients

  This work supplied the inherited eligible pair tables and source retrieval method. These records fixed the site and pulse selection before this simulation.

• usesUpdates from past pulses lowered mean interval score for selected 20–500 ms SEEG log sizes in eight patient sessions

  Used the fixed early waveform correlation rule to choose pairs before later outcomes.

• usesAn early timing check selected SEEG pairs with higher mean 10 ms peak precision in a 20–500 ms window in eight patient sessions

  We used its eight-patient bipolar cohort, source manifest, pulse rules, and processing audit. We reloaded all source voltage files and checked its shape scores before measuring dominant-peak timing.

• usesFive-pulse averages passed a SEEG shape check more often than individual pulses at selected readouts in eight patient sessions

  The exact trial products, chronological source indices, contact rules, and early five-pulse selection rule enabled the later individual-pulse test. The new result keeps the prior mean-waveform outcome and compares it with individual final pulses.

• usesFive direct calibration pulses gave lower voltage size prediction error than an earlier reverse measurement in seven SEEG sessions

  This study uses the exact trial Gram matrices, event and site tables, source metadata, and extraction code. These inputs permit the matching reverse-direction size test. Fresh retrieval reproduced all archived arrays and tables for sub-01 and sub-08.

• usesA five-pulse shape check selected later repeatable SEEG readouts with 73 percent mean precision in eight patient sessions

  This study uses all 886 trial-product readouts, the chronological pulse index, the source metadata, and the adapted retrieval code. It tests separate later pulse groups and compares shape with size at equal readout counts within sites. The original first-five-versus-final-five precision is also reproduced.

• usesExact path selection increased SEEG calibration scores with an uncertain later yield increase under a rounded 50 percent contact limit in eight patients

  This study used the exact trial Gram representation and extraction method that originated in this publication. A later cited publication supplied the corrected archive. The new outcome used five later pulses separate from the calibration pulses.

• usesEight SEEG sessions averaged 80.4 percent later joint waveform agreement after early shape selection with a size factor of 1.25

  Its extraction code, source hashes, contact restrictions, source metadata, and exact trial products enabled this secondary analysis. These files were imported through the direct parent and are preserved without change.

• usesReplacing data after pulses with zero changed theta phase labels 50 ms before pulses with a centered 1 s filter in eight SEEG sessions

  Used the eligible bipolar pair pool, source file records, pinned metadata, and chronological pulse indices. Selected one pair per site by contact indices. Downloaded voltage data from OpenNeuro and calculated new phase results.

• usesSeparate pair bounds covered 71.5 percent of individual SEEG responses and 17.0 percent of whole pulses at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions

  Uses the original compact extraction and its source selection method through the parent package. The public source products are the basis for the waveform Gram matrices.

• usesThe nearest half of bipolar SEEG pairs outside the stimulated shaft had a higher mean rate of repeatable responses than the random expectation in eight epilepsy sessions

  We use the eight chronological trial-product archives, pair tables, source metadata, and extraction code from this publication. They define the waveform outcomes and the eligible bipolar pool. We add native coordinate metadata and a fixed distance selection rule. This is a secondary analysis of the same cohort.

• usesFour-pulse fitting reduced error but did not show smaller joint envelopes for 20–500 ms SEEG in eight sessions with five early pulses

  This publication defined the bipolar readout rules and the original compact extraction. We kept those rules for the fixed-budget test.

• usesFour-bit storage reduced waveform payload by 87% and increased mean normalized 20–500 ms forecast error by 0.70% compared with float32 in eight SEEG sessions

  The original extraction recipe defined the adjacent bipolar pairs, good-pulse rules, source row mapping, and exact time windows. We preserved that recipe through the noise-scale publication.

• usesClipped inverse pre-pulse power weights increased mean later SEEG forecast error in eight epilepsy patient sessions

  Used its exact trial products, chronological pulse indices, contact rules, source metadata, and extraction code to compare pre-pulse power weights with an equal five-pulse mean on later pulses.

• usesFive-pulse noise scaling reduced later single-pulse error for 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG in eight patient sessions

  This study used the eligible pairs, ordered pulse products, source metadata, and extraction code from this publication. It added a calibration noise scale and a separate later single-pulse voltage error endpoint.

• usesSize and shape calibration gave a 0.002 lower mean voltage agreement at a 50 percent pair budget in eight SEEG sessions

  This publication supplied the original compact data product and extraction method for five-pulse SEEG calibration. The current study retains its contact and pulse rules, tests a centered concordance rank, and uses disjoint final-five pulse groups for the main outcome.

• usesFull-session calibration gave no clear mean error reduction for five-pulse SEEG forecasts at 20–500 ms in eight patients

  This work supplied the eligible same-block bipolar SEEG cohort and the first-five/final-five pulse split. All 886 eligible rows were retained.

• usesFour fixed temporal scales increased mean 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG forecast error relative to one scale in eight patient sessions with five calibration pulses

  This publication supplied the fixed pair definitions, pulse maps, source metadata, and earlier cohort extraction code.

• usesA joint rank check accepted 83.2 percent of later SEEG responses at 20 to 500 ms in eight patients after five calibration pulses

  Uses the source extraction code through the direct input archive. The code implements the bipolar spatial rules and chronological waveform selection. This investigation executed it on fresh public processed sources for sub-01 and sub-05.

• usesA fixed update from one SEEG readout increased centered voltage error on other shafts at 20 to 500 ms in eight patient sessions after five calibration pulses

  This work supplied the original exact voltage product method, spatial contact rules, and public source extractor inherited through the direct parent.

• usesTwo early measures reduced loss for five-pulse SEEG error estimates at 20–500 ms in six of eight patients with epilepsy

  We inherited the public-source extraction recipe through the immediate input package. We executed its current version to rebuild three patients from pinned source hashes.

• usesFive-pulse SEEG pair selection gave an uncertain 0.87% mean early excess across eight sessions at 20 to 500 ms

  Uses its original rules for remote bipolar pairs, centered pulse windows, and public derivative retrieval through the cited archive.

• usesComplementary pair selection gave 68.4% later SEEG shape matches versus 68.8% for separate ranking in eight sessions at r ≥ 0.8

  This publication started the compact bipolar SEEG data product used through later versions. This study preserves its source credit and license terms. The immediate parent supplies the exact input bytes.

• usesThe clipped five-pulse SEEG rule bounds forecast size when one calibration waveform changes

  The study used the fixed bipolar readout selection and corrected chronological first-five and final-five pulse split from this benchmark.

• usesForecast updates reduced 20–500 ms SEEG error by 3.1 percent compared with a fixed five-pulse forecast in eight patient sessions

  This test uses the exact ten-pulse bipolar voltage products, chronological trial selection, extraction code, and provenance from this package. New source rebuilds checked sub-05 and sub-08. The new analysis compares sequential forecasts over the final pulses.

• usesA five-pulse check selected SEEG pairs with 60.8% mean shape agreement after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions

  We used the fixed five-pulse split check, correlation threshold, and time window. We tested new STReEF data after recorded contact order reversal.

• usesA three-part test did not establish lower 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error than one scale in eight sessions

  This benchmark supplied the retained limbic recording pairs, exact trial products, first-five and final-five pulse identities, source reference rules, and chronological correction. The new test keeps those inputs and tests separate fixed component scales.

• usesFive later pulses did not show higher SEEG size correlation across shafts at 20–500 ms than before stimulation in eight sessions with readouts selected from five early pulses

  We used its exact ten-pulse product matrices, adjacent bipolar readout rules, pulse event mapping, source metadata, and checked retrieval code. We tested a new correlation of single-pulse sizes across separate electrode shafts in the same eight sessions. Fresh source derivatives for sub-01 and sub-08 reproduced the inputs.

• usesA pulse order test under joint exchangeability did not detect closer adjacent 20 to 500 ms SEEG responses in eight sessions

  Used its compact SEEG trial-product data definitions through publication 9bce93be-1b20-4866-aaba-17142e5e136d. The retrieval recipe retains that data model.

• usesAn equal patient rate mixture increased five pulse SEEG shape forecast error in eight sessions

  This work uses the inherited compact data lineage and public derivative retrieval method first preserved here. The license and attribution are retained.

• usesNominal 90 percent size bounds gave 62.6 percent mean joint coverage at 53 SEEG sites with multiple readouts in eight sessions

  We reused the original extraction code, spatial inclusion rules, and early waveform correlation check. We rebuilt complete public derivatives for patients 05 and 08 and verified the inherited compact input hashes.

• usesCutoff selection from five pulses increased mean 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error relative to full waveform scaling in eight patients

  The fixed site and bipolar readout definitions, pulse row map, metadata, and source retrieval method came from this cohort through the cited parent publications.

• usesAn offline noise rule saved calibration pulses and raised mean SEEG forecast error in eight sessions

  We used the corrected pulse product matrices for eight patients, 86 stimulation sites, and 886 bipolar readouts. We also used the source metadata, extraction code, and source hashes. These inputs enabled a new sequential pulse rule and an exact pulse-budget comparison. We rebuilt the complete compact data for patients 01, 05, and 08 from public sources and reproduced their file hashes.

• usesRetained pulse order showed no clear extra gain for mean SEEG forecasts at 20–500 ms with variance scaling in eight sessions

  Used all eight compact SEEG data files, edge and site maps, fixed spatial rules, source metadata, and the pinned extraction recipe. Imported files passed archive hashes. Two complete source derivatives were freshly rebuilt.

• usesA changed center reduced 20 to 500 ms SEEG bound radii by 9.7 percent in eight patients after five early pulses

  This publication supplied the original GPL extraction code and data definitions reused through the input publication.

• usesAn offline two-pulse site rank did not show lower 20–500 ms SEEG forecast error at a fixed budget in eight sessions

  We reused the public derivative retrieval and extraction code, source metadata, anatomical pair rules, and same-block reference cancellation analysis. This enabled source rebuilds and the compact fixed-budget benchmark.

• usesEarlier-site variation lowered error divided by first-pulse energy but raised voltage error versus a fixed half-size SEEG forecast from one pulse at 20–500 ms in eight sessions

  This study retains the original readout and pulse selection rules and source retrieval code through the cited data parent.

• usesSeparate five-pulse profiles had higher mean SEEG spatial error than a shared profile at 20–500 ms in seven patient sessions

  This publication first made the exact ten-pulse Gram products and contact tables. We use them unchanged through the direct parent. Its source extraction and chronology work enabled the spatial energy calculation.

• usesFive pulses per site gave higher later 20–500 ms voltage scores than the nearest midpoint rule in seven offline SEEG sessions

  The inherited source extraction follows this study's good bipolar pair rules, source trial maps, and fixed cohort criteria. The new site comparison keeps those source rules.

• usesA paired test with five early pulses did not establish lower SEEG prediction error for voltage selection than shape selection in eight patients

  This work created the exact products and public source retrieval recipe preserved in our input package. We used them to calculate voltage errors and to check a complete source derivative.

• usesMean scaled SEEG waveform error at 20–500 ms was 0.032 below a five-pulse estimate in eight patient sessions

  This publication supplied the original source extraction recipe and reference, contact, and pulse rules through the direct input parent. We preserved the unchanged recipe and used it to rebuild two patients from fresh complete public source files.

• usesNominal 90 percent size bounds gave 62.6 percent mean joint coverage at 53 SEEG sites with multiple readouts in eight sessions

  We reused the original extraction code, spatial inclusion rules, and early waveform correlation check. We rebuilt complete public derivatives for patients 05 and 08 and verified the inherited compact input hashes.

• usesA scaled pulse triplet kept five-pulse SEEG forecast size bounded under two replacements and increased error in eight unchanged sessions

  Its chronological first-five and final-five benchmark supplied the cohort and trial-selection rules.

• usesFive test pulses did not establish a 4–30 Hz SEEG covariance change between shafts in eight patients under independent pulses with stable means and second moments

  This report supplies the original eligibility builder and fixed good pulse selection rules. Its source code is preserved for inspection.

More citing publications