A paired test with five early pulses did not establish lower SEEG prediction error for voltage selection than shape selection in eight patients
We compared two rules that select one SEEG recording pair at each stimulation site. The voltage rule minimized relative squared voltage error. The shape rule maximized waveform correlation. Both used five early good pulses. We tested the choices on five later good pulses in the same session. OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 supplied 84 sites with a readout choice in eight patients. The geometric patient error ratio was 1.101 for voltage selection divided by shape selection. The descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval was 0.992 to 1.314. The paired two-sided sign-flip probability was 0.28125. The test did not establish lower error for voltage selection or equivalence between rules. The rules chose the same pair at 74 of 84 sites. The package preserves exact products for 886 candidate combinations, pulse scores, three figures, code, source hashes, and retrieval instructions. A complete sub-05 source derivative passed direct product and pulse-score checks. The other patients use hash-checked archived products with prior extraction records. The scope is clinical limbic data and same-session prediction, conditional on retrospective source quality labels. Online control and stimulation effects were not tested.
SEEG · brain-computer interface · readout selection · voltage prediction · waveform correlation · pulse response · calibration · intracranial EEG
References
5- usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f
This work created the exact products and public source retrieval recipe preserved in our input package. We used them to calculate voltage errors and to check a complete source derivative.
- usesAt a 0.8 correlation cutoff, selected bipolar SEEG readouts matched five-pulse means more often than single later pulses in eight sessions sci:sha256:a63924971b6ce32517242a4295a05fb5d3d051d8974abb0024f1be1b81ed1c01
We copied and hash-checked its 97 upstream files. They supply the exact pulse products, contact records, source hashes, and extraction code for the paired readout selection test.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis used the archived OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1 source products.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFive-pulse consistency selection had an uncertain 5.1-point mean scaled forecast gain over nearest SEEG pairs in eight patient sessions
This sensor-choice benchmark compared voltage and shape rules on the same pulse data. It informed our separate comparison with physical distance and scaled single-pulse skill. We preserve its metadata and state the shared test-data limit.