A five-pulse check selected SEEG pairs with 60.8% mean shape agreement after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions
We tested a fixed five-pulse check in public STReEF SEEG data from eight people with epilepsy. The test used 96 stimulation conditions and 6,803 stimulation-to-readout instances. Each condition had five pulses at each of two reversed contact orders. The check used the first order only. A match required a same-sign waveform correlation of at least 0.8 at 20 < t < 500 ms. With equal person weights, the check selected 9.1% of instances. Match rates were 60.8% in selected instances and 9.8% in all instances. The mean gain was 51.0 percentage points. Its descriptive 95% person bootstrap interval was 36.1 to 63.8 points. All eight person gains were positive. Both orders passed their own checks in 434 instances, but 37 failed the match across orders. Contact order and time were linked. This test does not establish a polarity cause, neural origin, or live BCI benefit. The package has exact pulse products, a fixed sample, source versions, range hashes, code, figures, and a public-source retrieval recipe. A fresh copy reproduced all numerical results and PNG figures.
SEEG · intracranial EEG · epilepsy · stimulation · response repeatability · waveform correlation · contact order · signal selection
References
4- usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f
We used the fixed five-pulse split check, correlation threshold, and time window. We tested new STReEF data after recorded contact order reversal.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
Source data: the study used the eight SEEG participants in STReEF, OpenNeuro ds005448; exact source object versions, URLs, and hashes are preserved.
- doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
- doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6
Cited by
43 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA five-pulse 1 mA SEEG template with one shared scale had more 2 mA forecast error than a three-pulse 2 mA template with a noise scale in three people at 20–500 ms
The input extraction code adapts its MIT range checks and metadata parser. This package preserves that code and its credit.
- usesPulse pooling gave lower observed mean normalized SEEG error at 20–500 ms after contact order reversal in eight recordings
This publication supplied the locked 96-condition STReEF sample, ten-pulse Gram products, contact maps, exact source versions and hashes, and retrieval code. We reused all eight SEEG participants. Our new test predicts fixed later individual pulses from new-only and pooled templates. It reports pulse-count, gain, absolute-error, and before-pulse controls. This is an extension of that cohort, not an independent cohort replication.
- usesSEEG variation ranks had greater agreement than mean waveform size ranks across contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight people
This study uses the fixed 96-condition sample, exact pulse products, source versions, and retrieval code. It adds rank agreement and later recording pair selection tests.
- usesA scale fit from one pulse lowered mean SEEG forecast error in six of eight sessions after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms
This forecast test uses the fixed STReEF sample, earlier response check, exact pulse products, source metadata, and raw-range retrieval code. It adds held-out pulse forecasts, scale-fit errors, and independent waveform checks.
- usesA joint SEEG rank check gave a positive adjusted change in six of eight sessions after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms
This publication supplied the metadata selection and raw range extraction code. The package preserves and checks these source methods.
- usesEarly energy with slopes from other people reduced late SEEG log energy forecast error by 11.1 percent in eight people with reversed test contact order
This work supplies the original metadata-only selection procedure and MIT retrieval code inherited through the native-product publication. The package preserves that code, its MIT notice, and a check that rebuilds the selection exactly.
- usesMean corrected SEEG change score was greater at 20 to 100 ms than at 100 to 500 ms after contact order reversal in eight people
Uses the original metadata-only sample selection and adjacent bipolar readout method, retained through the direct parent package. Keeps the original selection code and license.
- usesSEEG dispersion from five pulses showed no clear mean excess change after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight people
We used its retained metadata selection and extraction method. It defined the fixed conditions and recording pairs before this analysis.
- usesA signed cosine reader had lower mean site accuracy than a voltage distance reader for recorded 1 mA to 2 mA transfer in three STReEF SEEG patients with eight pairs per patient at 20 to 100 ms
The range checks and metadata selection adapt its MIT source methods through the cited current-transfer input. The inherited code and license remain in the package.
- usesTwo versus five calibration pulses changed 54 of 258 SEEG site choices under a half-energy rule in eight people at 100 to 500 ms
The inherited metadata sample and voltage extraction code came from this work. We preserved the selection scripts and source records for the new comparison.
- usesA 1 mA prior changed observed scaled 2 mA forecast error by less than 1% against matched zero shrinkage in three SEEG participants at 20 to 500 ms with calibration from other sites
The inherited public byte-range and binary-parser workflow has its source lineage in this publication.
- usesDisjoint pulse products gave greater 20 to 100 ms SEEG energy estimates for common components than for components that change sign in eight sessions
We reuse the exact 96-condition metadata-selected SEEG sample, pulse Gram products, raw audits, source metadata, version and range records, and extraction code. They support a new disjoint-pulse component analysis at 20 to 100 ms with equal condition weights. This is the same cohort.
- usesMean 2–30 Hz power correlation across SEEG shafts was lower after pulses in later blocks of five pulses in eight STReEF patients
Two inherited MIT source helpers replay the metadata sample and retrieve metadata. The new raw check adapts the pinned range retrieval pattern. The code and source credit are preserved through the direct input publication.
- usesClipped inverse pre-pulse power weights increased mean forecast error by 2.23 percent for centered 20 to 500 ms SEEG voltage in eight patients with reversed test contact order
This publication supplied the original metadata-only selection and MIT retrieval code. We adapted that code to rebuild the full selection with the saved raw version IDs.
- usesDoubling a template with a scale from three 1 mA pulses increased 2 mA SEEG forecast error in three patients at 20 to 500 ms
The source range and metadata selection code descends from this work through publication e8cceeac-31c5-4ead-a294-33b53d7bfcb2. Original code and MIT terms are preserved in the package.
- usesEarly repeatable readouts accounted for 74 percent of mean SEEG error reduction against zero at 20 to 500 ms in eight patients after contact order reversal
The selection and retrieval code trace to this source. The package retains its MIT code notice and source attribution.
- usesFive-pulse estimates showed a greater mean 100 to 500 ms rise in repeatable power fraction at 2 to 30 Hz than at 70 to 150 Hz in eight STReEF SEEG runs
We used its metadata selection method and three unchanged MIT source helper files to identify eligible conditions and retrieve pinned BrainVision byte ranges.
- usesSigned SEEG alignment at 20 to 500 ms exceeded a before-pulse control in eight people after contact order reversal
This study reused the original metadata selection and pulse extraction code. The package retains that code and its license. An adapted extractor checked native waveform products and the source bytes. The earlier response gate was not used.
- usesSigned templates had mean AUC 0.7925 versus 0.83625 for energy at 20–500 ms after contact order reversal in eight SEEG sessions
The unchanged metadata planner, eligibility rules, and selection check define the eight-person sample and its 6,803 candidate readout-condition rows. The planner and check are included with their source terms.
- usesDoubling three-pulse 1 mA templates increased 2 mA voltage forecast error at 31 STReEF SEEG sites from 20 to 500 ms
We reused pinned STReEF source metadata and the S3 object inventory. We adapted the MIT range checks and metadata selection parser. We retrieved new voltage ranges and computed new current-transfer losses.
- usesA half-weight update raised mean relative forecast error by 1.0% in selected SEEG readouts from eight sessions after contact order reversal
This study supplied the fixed 96-condition sample, the original-pulse selection rule, exact response products, metadata, and extraction code. We rebuilt all 960 public source ranges. The new test scores fixed waveform updates on later pulses. It uses the same recordings and is not an independent cohort.
- usesFive calibration pulses selected SEEG pairs with greater later repeatable power fraction change than random selection at 2 to 30 Hz in eight STReEF patients with Hann windows
We used the inherited metadata selection and source retrieval helpers from this work. They define eligible bipolar SEEG pairs and permit checked source extraction.
- usesFour-pair monitoring lowered error versus a five-pulse template but not zero for centered 10 ms SEEG voltage at 20–500 ms in eight patients
We used its fixed metadata selection of 96 conditions in eight STReEF SEEG patients, source metadata, pinned raw object versions, and range retrieval checks. We retrieved all 960 ranges again and made new complete 10 ms voltage inputs for spatial model fitting.
- usesCommon size removal changed mean accuracy by 0.6 percentage points for neighboring sites after contact order reversal in eight SEEG sessions
We used its fixed STReEF sample, pulse Gram arrays, selection, source metadata, and source retrieval code for a new reader comparison.
- usesWith fixed forecasts, limits from three recent scores covered 13.5 percent of five-pulse SEEG runs after contact order reversal in eight sessions
This publication supplies all 96 fixed STReEF conditions, 6803 eligible readout instances, exact waveform products, source metadata, version pins, and source retrieval code. They enable the paired fixed and recent error limit test.
- usesEarly RMS lowered late SEEG forecast error beyond pre-pulse RMS in linear models with five calibration pulses per condition in eight STReEF patients
This study uses the fixed metadata selector for good adjacent bipolar SEEG readouts outside stimulated shafts.
- usesFive-pulse weights with 50 percent covariance shrinkage increased later 2 to 30 Hz SEEG log power variance by 39.0 percent at 100 to 500 ms in eight STReEF patients
We inherited its MIT metadata selection and retrieval helpers through the direct source. We kept the selection helper and added retries and verified caching to metadata retrieval. The sample rule replayed on freshly retrieved metadata.
- usesAfter 20 ms blanking, future reflection changed symmetric 7 Hz phase more before pulses than controls in eight STReEF patients
Uses the original metadata-based sample selection and adjacent remote bipolar readout method. The selection code and license are retained.
- usesCommon average and bipolar scores selected different contacts in 15 of 16 SEEG conditions from eight people
This study used the source metadata, initial metadata-based condition selection, exact raw S3 version pins, and HTTP range validation pattern from this publication. It retrieved new voltage ranges for sixteen conditions and made new reference signals, calibration scores, and later bipolar forecast tests.
- usesA joint SEEG check with five early pulses accepted 71.0 percent of later 20 to 500 ms maps after contact order reversal in eight people
The metadata-only selection planner and selection check are copied from this publication. A new temporary-copy rebuild reproduced the locked selection and full eligibility inventory exactly.
- usesThree fit pulses per contact order gave 63.5% test accuracy for recorded stimulation blocks in eight SEEG patients
We reused the fixed 96 conditions, waveform inner products, exact source ranges, metadata, and MIT extraction code. We added a reader with separate fit and test pulses and a before-pulse control.
- usesWith local time centering, equal windows raised mean early SEEG variance ratios from 0.46 to 1.01 in eight STReEF patients
Uses the original metadata-based sample selection and adjacent bipolar readout method, retained through the direct parent package. Selection replay matched all 96 conditions and 6803 readout-condition rows. The source code and license are preserved.
- usesFive-pulse ranking increased mean later 70 to 110 Hz directional power change by 0.049 dB after contact order reversal in eight SEEG sessions
This work created the exact eight-person, 96-condition source sample used here. We kept its metadata selection and contact-order split. This is a new spectral analysis of the same cohort.
- usesA scale from five early pulses reduced full template SEEG error at 20 to 500 ms after contact order reversal in eight people
This publication supplied the original metadata selection and extraction for the fixed STReEF sample. This package retains that source code and provenance through the direct input publication.
- usesA fixed SEEG transfer rule gave no clear gain over two new pulses at 20 to 500 ms after contact order reversal in eight sessions
We used its fixed metadata sample, pulse Gram products, readout tables, source pins, and extraction code. We tested voltage error with two later calibration pulses and three separate test pulses. Its earlier endpoint was waveform shape. We retrieved 80 pinned public raw ranges again to check the reused products.
- usesThe fixed template power ratio rose by 0.16 dB from before to 100 to 500 ms after pulses at 2 to 30 Hz in eight SEEG patients
The original metadata selection method and public range reader come from this work. We preserve its three source utility files and license through the immediate spectral source publication. The local audit rebuilds the fixed selection with that method.
- usesTotal power selection from five pulses gave greater later variance gain than variance selection at 2 to 30 Hz and 100 to 500 ms in eight STReEF SEEG patients
The inherited metadata selection and public source retrieval helpers derive from this publication. We preserved the helpers and rebuilt all source pulse spectra.
- usesPulse time gave 80.8 percent site accuracy after recorded contact order reversal in offline tests of 12 sites in each of eight SEEG patients
We used its fixed metadata selection of 12 sites in each of eight STReEF SEEG patients. We replayed all 96 conditions with its preserved selection code. The new primary result tests time-only site prediction on this recorded contact order split.
- usesFixed donor variance weights raised mean SEEG pulse AUC with 16 temporal modes after five fit pulses in eight people from a separate cohort
Retains the metadata planner and selection check code for the fixed target sample. A replay checks the same 96 conditions and 6,803 readout conditions.
- usesDoubling 1 mA templates increased 2 mA forecast error after mean removal in three SEEG participants at 20 to 500 ms
This publication supplied source metadata and the BrainVision range method. We adapted the parser and source checks. We retrieved each selected matched-current range anew and computed new scores.
- usesWith a correct linear mean and equal independent errors, 366 STReEF SEEG order contrasts had a median variance factor of 4.32
We used its fixed metadata selection, exact pulse products, source records, and retrieval code. These inputs enabled the voltage contrast sensitivity test. We checked input hashes, rebuilt the selection, and tested fresh raw data for one condition in each patient. We did not retest its response selection rule.
- usesPre-pulse RMS reduced mean 20–500 ms log-RMS forecast error in eight STReEF patients with earlier calibration after recorded contact order reversal
The included metadata retrieval and sample selection code derives from this publication through the STReEF input study. We retained the MIT notice and used that code to retrieve metadata and rebuild the sample.
- usesA scale update had lower geometric mean error than half-size pulse forecasts and higher error than zero in eight SEEG sessions at 20–500 ms
Uses the fixed 96-condition sample, exact pulse products, source records, and metadata selection and retrieval code. These inputs enabled a new chronological forecast test. The package credits all inherited files and code.