sciscape Publications
← All publications

Early RMS lowered late SEEG forecast error beyond pre-pulse RMS in linear models with five calibration pulses per condition in eight STReEF patients

We tested whether early voltage size improves a late voltage forecast beyond pre-pulse voltage size. We used public SEEG data from OpenNeuro STReEF ds005448, version 1.0.0. The sample had eight patients, 96 selected conditions, and 960 source pulses. Each condition had five calibration pulses and five later test pulses after a change in recorded stimulation contact order. Linear models used only completed earlier calibration sets in the same patient. Adding 20–100 ms log RMS to pre-pulse log RMS lowered 100–500 ms forecast error by 7.84% on average. All eight patient gains were positive. The descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was [6.16, 9.53]%. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip value was 0.0078125. An exact 500 ms shift of the windows gave a before-pulse control gain of 7.21%. The post-minus-control interval included zero. Thus the forecast gain does not establish a stimulation-specific effect. The tested question had no clear mean benefit in a prior ds004696 study. The present result has a different dataset and specified design changes. The package preserves six-window measurements, every forecast and fit, three figures, source code, source versions and hashes, native audit samples, and a streamed retrieval recipe. All 960 raw ranges passed source checks. Independent raw measurements, uncentered least-squares fits, timing checks, and a repeated analysis passed. This is a within-run, retrospective test of total recorded voltage. It does not test an online controller or a useful brain output.

stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interface · electrical stimulation · voltage forecast · root mean square · forecast error

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesEarly RMS did not lower mean late SEEG forecast error in fixed linear models with five calibration pulses per site in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:0a1332bac59dbb1f0933a47b90b106e503aad6a2bade7e7142173f46e206deb5

    This study repeats the early-versus-late RMS question and five-calibration-pulse comparison in another public SEEG dataset. Source settings, sample selection, model timing, and control windows differ. The earlier negative outcome is not contradicted for its tested scope.

  2. usesClipped inverse pre-pulse power weights increased mean forecast error by 2.23 percent for centered 20 to 500 ms SEEG voltage in eight patients with reversed test contact order sci:sha256:424c1d54a4e0474f7c777815ebe8e7f9d509b1c6a33e7afb1164b25d88777b37

    This study adapts the pinned native byte-range retrieval contracts and header checks.

  3. usesA five-pulse check selected SEEG pairs with 60.8% mean shape agreement after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions sci:sha256:35cdaeabceeac5a3be97a54a264240386954c3bac2e4558f03b24d86d28e2bee

    This study uses the fixed metadata selector for good adjacent bipolar SEEG readouts outside stimulated shafts.

  4. usesPre-pulse RMS reduced mean 20–500 ms log-RMS forecast error in eight STReEF patients with earlier calibration after recorded contact order reversal sci:sha256:f5e2aa58f61c35ecd378391e2e2bb292a24b212bce2225c9fdbf1266cd57799d

    This study uses the fixed 96-condition STReEF sample, RMS extraction code, source pins, and pre-only forecast reference. It adds an early input and matched background windows.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0

    Analyzed source data are from OpenNeuro STReEF ds005448 version 1.0.0.

  6. doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
  7. doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.