Pre-pulse 4–30 Hz power gave no clear forecast gain with five calibration pulses per site in eight SEEG sessions
Can power before stimulation improve a forecast of recorded power after stimulation? We tested public SEEG from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1. Eight epilepsy sessions supplied 86 sites and 886 remote bipolar recording pairs. Five pulses per site supplied calibration. Five later pulses supplied testing. A shared weighted slope used only calibration windows completed before each test cutoff. The primary input was 4–30 Hz log power from −900 to −500 ms. The target was power from 100 to 500 ms. The reference was the site/readout calibration mean. Equal-patient mean error reduction was −1.55%. Its descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was −4.61% to 1.15%. Four patients had positive reduction. Correct pulse pairing performed better than shuffled pairing, but it did not beat the site mean. The secondary 70–110 Hz score was −5.59%. This is an exploratory result for one sparse calibration rule in a reused cohort. It does not show absence of forecast information or a useful brain-writing effect. The package preserves all compact inputs, predictions, timing audits, source hashes, code, checks, and three figures.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · brain stimulation · power forecast · calibration · held-out prediction · Fourier power · epilepsy
References
4- usesEarly RMS lowered late SEEG forecast error beyond pre-pulse RMS in linear models with five calibration pulses per condition in eight STReEF patients sci:sha256:8af43413c4e6f4ace6a82bbe2555822eb4d7abc137a55d961a302f9865db1522
This related RMS study informed the completed-calibration time rule, weighted shared slope, and site/readout mean reference. The new study uses ds004696 and band log power. It does not reuse the related study input data or add independent patients to the ds004696 cohort.
- usesPaired after-to-before SEEG variance ratios were 1.51 times as large at 4–30 Hz as at 70–110 Hz in eight epilepsy patients sci:sha256:8458356ec5213c0dd5bd0996012fc425427060df29c390a5be8f7c9bc8a87d1c
This parent supplied the complete fixed pool of 886 remote bipolar pairs at 86 sites, compact Fourier arrays, native voltage examples, pulse maps, and source retrieval pins. The new study uses single-pulse band energies from the Gram diagonals to test held-out forecasts. It does not repeat the parent variance-ratio endpoint.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis uses processed CRP voltage derivatives from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
This is the data authors’ study describing the experiment and dataset used here.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFive-pulse Hann forecasts at 100–500 ms had 18.7 points more excess skill at 4–30 Hz than at 70–110 Hz in eight SEEG patients
Its power forecast result supplies related context for this reused cohort. The report distinguishes its scalar log-power target from this signed voltage-vector target. Its numerical input files were not reused.
- usesAdded fitted 6 Hz phase beyond voltage size increased mean patient error by 2.28% for 20 to 100 ms SEEG forecasts in eight patients with five fit pulses per site and ridge strength 1
Used its first-five fitting design and its pre-pulse power forecast result to define a distinct test of fitted phase beyond voltage size for early centered waveforms. This study uses the same eight patients and supplies no independent replication sample.
- usesA fixed model gave no clear 4–30 Hz power forecast gain from input ending 20 ms versus 500 ms before a pulse for targets at 100–500 ms after the pulse in eight SEEG sessions
This work uses the fixed readout tables, source pins, source metadata, and retrieval code from this parent. It extends the older-power forecast to all good pulses and compares two input ages. All 17,720 matching older and post power rows agree with the parent.
- usesFive final pulses per site gave no clear mean 4–30 Hz power correlation after linear trend removal in eight SEEG patients
This parent supplied all 32 compact input files, the fixed pool of 886 remote bipolar pair instances at 86 sites, extraction and retrieval code, and source provenance. Its correct-pairing result and drift limit motivated the new residual power correlation test. The new score is descriptive and uses measured post values. It does not reproduce the forecast endpoint or add independent patients.
- usesAdding beta concentration increased mean 20–500 ms SEEG error forecast loss beyond power in eight people after five calibration pulses
This study uses the fixed pair and pulse tables, source pins, metadata, and retrieval code. Its native voltage examples permit checks of the new extraction.