sciscape Publications
← All publications

Five-pulse Hann forecasts at 100–500 ms had 18.7 points more excess skill at 4–30 Hz than at 70–110 Hz in eight SEEG patients

In eight SEEG patients, a five-pulse mean forecast had more excess skill at 4–30 Hz than at 70–110 Hz. The main test used Hann-tapered voltage at 100–500 ms after a pulse. Skill was 1 minus squared forecast error divided by target energy. Excess skill was the after-pulse score minus the matched before-pulse score. The analysis used 886 remote bipolar pair instances at 86 sites. The first five good pulses fit the mean. The last five good pulses tested it. The paired contrast used site medians and equal patient weights. Its mean was 18.72 percentage points. The descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was 11.79 to 26.24 points. The contrast was positive in all eight patients. Mean after-pulse skill was -2.49% in the low band and -18.77% in the high band. Neither band showed a clear mean gain over zero voltage. Fixed control analyses kept a positive mean contrast. A rectangular taper reduced it to 7.55 points. The score separates alignment from template energy cost. The package includes a proof, source code, voltage coefficients, event maps, provenance, figures, and reproduction instructions. All eight complete public derivative files passed their full hashes and reproduced the saved inputs exactly. A second run reproduced all numerical results exactly. This is an exploratory study of a known cohort. It does not establish neural origin or live BCI benefit.

stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · electrical stimulation · voltage forecasting · brain-computer interface · spectral analysis · forecast skill · Hann window

Admitted 3 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesSigned SEEG alignment at 20 to 500 ms exceeded a before-pulse control in eight people after contact order reversal sci:sha256:566477652590c53f83112c199b70fdca7b0e1f47861e04e334107dda534bae03

    Its signed alignment result in a different SEEG cohort supplies context for the distinction between sign transfer and improvement over zero. The report states that this caution and the squared-error expansion are not new general results. Its numerical input files were not reused.

  2. usesPower weights fit from five pulses gave no clear mean 20–500 ms SEEG voltage forecast gain in eight sessions sci:sha256:5f8ad290d211abb81202a82ed21683bfe60c8df22cceb4e18c340cf2fc14ee28

    Its fitted power-weight voltage forecast supplies context for the equal-mean reference in the same cohort. The report distinguishes its 20–500 ms weighting test from this 100–500 ms fixed-band contrast. Its numerical input files were not reused.

  3. usesPre-pulse 4–30 Hz power gave no clear forecast gain with five calibration pulses per site in eight SEEG sessions sci:sha256:09613652206a92eda6dd576015e4d407fd5d1d43996a9a9caab642c897822fe1

    Its power forecast result supplies related context for this reused cohort. The report distinguishes its scalar log-power target from this signed voltage-vector target. Its numerical input files were not reused.

  4. uses4–30 Hz SEEG variance remained greater after stimulation outside an early response plane in eight epilepsy patients sci:sha256:4e0a00e389aea5abca17ff3342ffafee0158c25370913bed80856b89e41ce7ae

    This study reuses the fixed eligible pair tables, early and later pulse maps, voltage coefficients, native audit voltages, source pins, metadata, and source extraction recipe. It tests the signed early mean on later pulses, rather than variance outside an early response plane.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    This study uses per-pulse voltage derivatives and source metadata from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.

  6. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023

Cited by

3 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.