SEEG dispersion from five pulses showed no clear mean excess change after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight people
We tested whether SEEG waveform variation changed after stimulation contact order reversal beyond its before-pulse change. Public STReEF data supplied eight people with focal epilepsy, 96 fixed conditions, 960 pulses, and 6,803 readout records. Each order supplied five pulses. At 20 to 500 ms, the group geometric ratio of ratios was 0.999. The descriptive 95 percent person-resample interval was 0.937 to 1.079. Four person contrasts were positive and four were negative. The exact two-sided sign permutation p value was 0.9766, under independent people and symmetric null contrasts. This result does not establish equal dispersion. An exact forecast error split gave 94.7 percent to the two pulse variation terms on the normalized score. A noise interpretation needs fixed means and zero expected products of different pulse deviations. Contact order and time changed together. The study does not establish a neural cause or live interface benefit. All 960 public source ranges were checked again and all rebuilt inputs matched. The package has three figures, native waveform examples, code, results, source hashes, a fixed plan, and repeat instructions.
SEEG · stimulation · pulse dispersion · waveform variability · forecast error · electrical stimulation · brain interface · focal epilepsy
References
6- usesSigned SEEG alignment at 20 to 500 ms exceeded a before-pulse control in eight people after contact order reversal sci:sha256:566477652590c53f83112c199b70fdca7b0e1f47861e04e334107dda534bae03
We used its fixed 96-condition SEEG sample, exact pulse products, native waveform examples, source records, and source check code. These inputs enabled the new dispersion comparison and forecast error decomposition. This study reuses the cohort.
- usesA scale fit from one pulse lowered mean SEEG forecast error in six of eight sessions after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms sci:sha256:18c6ed2417c8fa21e9a22c8580a0e0bf89683a8de79f7dbda88c0cbd316fe6c2
We used its retained source records, pulse products, methods, and licenses through the input publication chain.
- usesA five-pulse check selected SEEG pairs with 60.8% mean shape agreement after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions sci:sha256:35cdaeabceeac5a3be97a54a264240386954c3bac2e4558f03b24d86d28e2bee
We used its retained metadata selection and extraction method. It defined the fixed conditions and recording pairs before this analysis.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
The analysis uses the eight SEEG participants from STReEF, OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0, through pinned pulse ranges and derived inputs.
- doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
- doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSEEG variation ranks had greater agreement than mean waveform size ranks across contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight people
This study uses the definition of five-pulse dispersion and the result on average dispersion change to choose a separate question about recording pair ranks. It reuses the cohort.