A scale fit from one pulse lowered mean SEEG forecast error in six of eight sessions after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms
We tested a response forecast after the order of stimulation contacts changed. Public STReEF data supplied eight SEEG sessions and 668 selected readout instances. Five earlier pulses formed a template. One new pulse set its scale and sign. Two later pulses tested the forecast at 20 to 500 ms. Mean squared error, divided by earlier template power, fell from 0.924 to 0.650. Six person means fell and two rose. The exact person sign-flip test gave p = 0.125. The data do not establish a group benefit. A new template from one pulse gave mean error 1.190. The package contains exact pulse products, code, figures, all scores, and source retrieval steps. Fresh source checks covered all 960 pulse ranges. Contact order and time are linked. These recorded responses do not establish neural origin or live interface benefit.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · electrical stimulation · response forecasting · waveform scaling · epilepsy · signal processing
References
4- usesA five-pulse check selected SEEG pairs with 60.8% mean shape agreement after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions sci:sha256:35cdaeabceeac5a3be97a54a264240386954c3bac2e4558f03b24d86d28e2bee
This forecast test uses the fixed STReEF sample, earlier response check, exact pulse products, source metadata, and raw-range retrieval code. It adds held-out pulse forecasts, scale-fit errors, and independent waveform checks.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
The analyzed STReEF source data are identified as OpenNeuro ds005448; the saved source metadata pins version 1.0.0 and declares CC0.
- doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
- doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA joint SEEG rank check gave a positive adjusted change in six of eight sessions after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms
This publication supplied the exact STReEF pulse products, fixed 96-condition subset, native audit traces, and pinned public source records.
- usesSEEG dispersion from five pulses showed no clear mean excess change after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight people
We used its retained source records, pulse products, methods, and licenses through the input publication chain.
- usesTwo versus five calibration pulses changed 54 of 258 SEEG site choices under a half-energy rule in eight people at 100 to 500 ms
The immediate input publication used the fixed sample and products from this study. We reused that sample for the calibration budget comparison.
- usesSigned SEEG alignment at 20 to 500 ms exceeded a before-pulse control in eight people after contact order reversal
This study reused the fixed metadata sample, pulse product arrays, source headers, and pinned raw range records. A fresh retrieval checked all 960 source ranges. The new analysis used all eligible readouts and did not reuse the response selection gate.
- usesA half-weight update raised mean relative forecast error by 1.0% in selected SEEG readouts from eight sessions after contact order reversal
This related scale-fit study supplied context during the final source review, after primary scoring. It used different targets and scoring. We used no input data, code, or result from it to select this test, and we make no direct method comparison.
- usesA scale from five early pulses reduced full template SEEG error at 20 to 500 ms after contact order reversal in eight people
The fixed source sample and retained earlier code trace through this publication. Its new-pulse scale result was known. This study tests a scale from five early pulses without its response gate or later pulse fitting.