sciscape Publications
← All publications

Three fit pulses per contact order gave 63.5% test accuracy for recorded stimulation blocks in eight SEEG patients

We tested a reader of responses to electrical stimulation in public SEEG data. The source was OpenNeuro ds005448, version 1.0.0. The fixed sample had eight patients and 96 conditions. Each reader used one recording pair and three fit pulses at each contact order. Four other pulses tested the reader. Mean test accuracy was 63.5% at 20 to 500 ms after stimulation. An independently selected reader before stimulation gave 51.0%. The mean gain was 12.5 percentage points. A descriptive patient bootstrap interval was 3.6 to 20.8 points. The exact patient sign-flip value was 0.0625 under the stated symmetry assumption. Six patients improved and two declined. A fixed 20 to 100 ms check gave 71.1% accuracy. A fit check after pair selection gave 91.1%, which was higher than the test score. Contact order changed with time block. Thus the data do not show a causal effect of contact order. This offline study does not test a live interface or useful brain writing. The package contains figures, fit and test tables, source data recipes, exact waveform inner products, and code. Native range hashes and independent calculations passed the checks.

stereo-electroencephalography · electrical stimulation · calibration · response classification · temporal confounding · brain-computer interface

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

4
  1. usesA five-pulse check selected SEEG pairs with 60.8% mean shape agreement after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions sci:sha256:35cdaeabceeac5a3be97a54a264240386954c3bac2e4558f03b24d86d28e2bee

    We reused the fixed 96 conditions, waveform inner products, exact source ranges, metadata, and MIT extraction code. We added a reader with separate fit and test pulses and a before-pulse control.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0

    The analyzed recordings are from OpenNeuro STReEF ds005448 version 1.0.0; source object versions and byte-range hashes are preserved.

  3. doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
  4. doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.