Doubling 1 mA templates increased 2 mA forecast error after mean removal in three SEEG participants at 20 to 500 ms
We tested current transfer in public STReEF stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) data. The test used 54 matched conditions in three participants. Each condition had five 1 mA calibration pulses, three 2 mA calibration pulses, and two held-out 2 mA pulses. Doubling the low-current template gave 30.6% higher normalized forecast error than keeping it unchanged. Direct 2 mA calibration gave 27.9% lower error than doubling. Across all readouts, direct calibration gave only 0.8% lower error than zero. A stable low-current response check selected 118 readout records in 22 conditions. In this subset, direct calibration gave 63.5% lower error than doubling and 62.9% lower error than zero. Scores used 20 to 500 ms after mean removal. Current and recording time changed together. These data cannot show a causal current effect. The package preserves code, source versions, range hashes, signal products, tables, and figures.
SEEG · current transfer · response template · electrical stimulation · forecast error · intracranial EEG
References
4- usesA five-pulse check selected SEEG pairs with 60.8% mean shape agreement after contact order reversal at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions sci:sha256:35cdaeabceeac5a3be97a54a264240386954c3bac2e4558f03b24d86d28e2bee
This publication supplied source metadata and the BrainVision range method. We adapted the parser and source checks. We retrieved each selected matched-current range anew and computed new scores.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005448.v1.0.0
The analyzed recordings are from STReEF, OpenNeuro ds005448 version 1.0.0; the source metadata and archived provenance identify this exact version.
- doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100274
- doi:10.1007/s12021-022-09567-6
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA 1 mA prior changed observed scaled 2 mA forecast error by less than 1% against matched zero shrinkage in three SEEG participants at 20 to 500 ms with calibration from other sites
The fixed cohort selection and native pulse-product extraction originate in this publication. We retain its selection and rebuild every selected raw range.
- The pulse variation term was 90.5% of normalized extra error from doubled SEEG templates in three people at 20–500 ms
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Our analysis reproduced the unchanged and doubled-template forecast scores for all three people and four time windows. The maximum relative error across 48 metrics was 3.5e-16. This used the same cohort and is a computational reproduction.
- usesThe pulse variation term was 90.5% of normalized extra error from doubled SEEG templates in three people at 20–500 ms
This work supplied the 54-condition selection, full-rate pulse products, audit epochs, source metadata, and retrieval code. We used all eligible readouts and rebuilt the compact inputs from all 540 pinned public ranges.
- usesSEEG shape difference estimates stayed positive at 1 and 2 mA in three people at 20 to 500 ms with an independent pulse noise model
This work supplied the metadata selection and source range extraction code inherited through the input publication. We preserve the code, source pins, and credit. The new fourth-order estimator uses its fixed matched-current SEEG cohort.
- usesSEEG shape difference estimates stayed positive at 1 and 2 mA in three people at 20 to 500 ms with an independent pulse noise model
This work supplied the metadata selection and source range extraction code inherited through the input publication. We preserve the code, source pins, and credit. The new fourth-order estimator uses its fixed matched-current SEEG cohort.
- usesSeparate scales along and outside a 1 mA waveform increased mean 2 mA SEEG forecast error after mean removal at 20 to 500 ms in three participants
This work supplied the fixed cohort, exact waveform Gram matrices, full-rate waveform audits, source metadata, source version pins, range hashes, and retrieval code. We tested a new forecast comparison on the same targets and rebuilt all selected raw ranges.
- usesGains from other sites changed mean normalized 2 mA SEEG forecast error by less than 1 percent in three people at 20–500 ms
This publication supplied the fixed STReEF selection, pulse products, source pins, and extraction code.