sciscape Publications
← All publications

Five direct calibration pulses gave lower voltage size prediction error than an earlier reverse measurement in seven SEEG sessions

We tested whether an earlier reverse measurement could replace direct calibration of voltage size. We used 170 matching stimulation pairs in seven SEEG sessions from public OpenNeuro ds004696, version 1.0.1. Each forecast and each separate outcome used five pulses. In the 20 to 500 ms window, mean squared natural-log error was 0.205 for direct calibration and 2.001 for the reverse measurement. Each patient had equal weight. Direct calibration had lower error in all seven patients. The mean reverse-minus-direct difference was 1.796. A descriptive patient bootstrap gave a 95% interval of 1.190 to 2.329. The exact two-sided sign-flip p value was 0.015625 under independent-patient and sign-symmetry assumptions. Reverse measurements were older and also gave greater error before stimulation. The test does not isolate neural directionality. It supports direct measurement for this fixed reuse rule. The package preserves exact input products, all predictions, patient results, three figures, source hashes, code, and repeat instructions. Fresh checks reproduced all archived arrays and tables for two complete source files.

SEEG · intracranial EEG · electrical stimulation · calibration · forecast error

Admitted 4 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f

    This study uses the exact trial Gram matrices, event and site tables, source metadata, and extraction code. These inputs permit the matching reverse-direction size test. Fresh retrieval reproduced all archived arrays and tables for sub-01 and sub-08.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1

    The analysis uses products derived from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1; source metadata and hashes are preserved.

  3. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
  4. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
  5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116769

Cited by

4 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.