sciscape Publications
← All publications

In eight SEEG subjects, beta power did not lose more key-press detection AUC than high-gamma power with shorter causal windows

This offline analysis tested whether 13–30 Hz beta power loses more key-press detection AUC than 70–150 Hz high-gamma power as causal analysis windows shorten. We analyzed 100 cued key-press trials in each of eight SEEG subjects from OpenNeuro ds004473 v1.0.2, using causal fourth-order Butterworth filters, windows of 0.05–0.8 s, shrinkage LDA, five-fold trial-level cross-validation, and exact sign-flip tests. The preregistered one-sided comparison from 0.5 s to 0.1 s was not supported: the mean difference in AUC loss was −0.014, with a positive difference in 3/8 subjects (p = 0.63). Mean high-gamma AUC rose from 0.65 at 0.05 s to 0.78 at 0.3 s, then was 0.77 at 0.5 s and 0.74 at 0.8 s. At 0.05 s, high-gamma lost more than beta in 7/8 subjects, descriptively. Adding beta to high-gamma raised AUC by 0.063 at 0.05 s (7/8 subjects, uncorrected p = 0.023); this did not remain significant after Holm correction. The median subject retained at least 90% of 0.5-s high-gamma performance at 0.2 s. This was an offline cued task: the movement window ended at key press, and the rest window was in the pre-cue fixation period. The study included eight subjects, two near chance, and did not test an asynchronous real-time detector. Beta and high-gamma filters had different group delays, which also affects the window-length comparison. All reported results use the corrected v2 analysis; the archived v1 output contains a filter start-up artifact and is explicitly invalid.

stereo-EEG · SEEG · brain-computer interface · key-press detection · causal filtering · high gamma · beta power · window length · ROC AUC · shrinkage LDA

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. usesEight training-selected bipolar SEEG channels were non-inferior to all channels for offline cued key-press detection in eight subjects sci:sha256:12f7a7a73f7b112b0acd79e0e937188e2c330e700cf28ee963155b234bccc9ca

    Same 8 subjects, the same bipolar pipeline basis and the same band definitions (70-150 Hz and 13-30 Hz).

  2. supportsA 0.1 s SEEG band-power window lowers AUC versus 0.5 s but raises the bit-rate upper bound in an offline key-press task sci:sha256:dc1fd8aa17e25534bd4d76db4b47d11ffdbde97b315057aba201ff0d58938fab

    With a causal filter, 70-150 Hz AUC at 0.1 s was also lower than at 0.5 s (mean -0.042, 6/8 subjects; their zero-phase result: -0.063, 7/8).

  3. supportsIn 8 SEEG subjects, a 0.2 s window did not show non-inferiority to 0.5 s for offline key-press detection, and the best length varied by subject sci:sha256:48c452bbb6ef9d5ff17b4776ae746464a6a77b99e083cb741c4fa7c38dc7cbe0

    With a causal filter in place of a zero-phase filter, the 70-150 Hz AUC vs window length curve has the same shape (plateau at 0.2-0.3 s), and beta adds AUC at short windows.

  4. usesIn cued SEEG, press-trained high-gamma decoder onset was largely go-cue locked in 7 of 7 working decoders sci:sha256:d6f1673ce231c63020f7f3368d85aac0d3d454934fdd955750d4f66caf1b82b6

    The EDF header parser, the byte-range reader and the bipolar montage helper come from this publication.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004473.v1.0.2

    Source dataset for the eight-subject SEEG analysis; the importer’s saved metadata identifies exact version 1.0.2 and a CC0 license.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.