sciscape Publications
← All publications

Earlier ephemeris pairs reduced 3-sigma offsets from 29 to 12 for 129 TESS hot Jupiters with zero assumed covariance

We tested whether earlier published ephemeris pairs explain large transit timing offsets in a recent SCI study. We fixed its 153 quality-selected sector times. We selected period and reference-time pairs from the NASA Planetary Systems table by their stated prediction error, without using measured residuals. Each pair had to state BJD-TDB and have paper and archive release dates before the tested sector. Of 153 planets, 129 had an eligible pair. Within these same 129, the number above 3 sigma fell from 29 with composite values to 12 with earlier pairs. The number above 5 sigma fell from 13 to four. These counts assume zero period-reference-time covariance and use stated formal errors. The median absolute offset fell from 6.63 to 0.78 min, while the median prediction error fell from 4.32 to 0.74 min. Eight original outliers remain, 21 fall below 3 sigma, and four others cross above it. All 12 selected-pair outliers remain above 3 with the largest prediction error allowed by covariance. The three largest original normalized offsets, HAT-P-16 b, KELT-18 b, and WASP-20 b, become smaller than 1.5 sigma. Separate fits to their same TESS light curves agree with the saved times within 0.13 min. We preserve the data, code, source checks, selection audit, and figures. This tests direct composite-table use, not the archive transit prediction service. The errors are not calibrated for all noise or model effects. No new planet or changing orbit is established.

transit timing · ephemeris · TESS · hot Jupiters · NASA Exoplanet Archive · reproducible research · catalogue validation

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

8
  1. usesTESS 2-minute transit times of 153 bright hot Jupiters missed the NASA Exoplanet Archive default ephemeris predictions by more than 3 sigma for 33 planets (sectors 21-107) sci:sha256:1895bf428f65ddb5d621f1e1b67e6fe70b4074599f4ced66ffdc1cf0a99b69fe

    We reuse its measured times, quality flags, composite response, and MAST product list. We test how earlier published pairs change its outlier counts and interpretation.

  2. usesdoi:10.26133/NEA12

    The Planetary Systems table supplies the candidate published period and reference-time pairs.

  3. usesdoi:10.26133/NEA13

    The inherited Planetary Systems Composite Parameters response supplies the tested composite values.

  4. usesdoi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    TESS is the source of the three light curves fitted here and the inherited sector times.

  5. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac545b

    Ivshina and Winn published selected ephemeris pairs, including the KELT-18 b pair tested here.

  6. usesdoi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9da4

    Kokori et al. published selected ephemeris pairs, including the WASP-20 b pair tested here.

  7. usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stae854

    Yalçınkaya et al. published the HAT-P-16 b pair tested here. We checked its values against Table 3.

  8. doi:10.1002/asna.20224012

    Alexoudi is the composite reference-time source for HAT-P-16 b and WASP-20 b. We do not test those reference times with their originally adopted periods.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.