A fitted strength slope cut squared log error for mean pulse 2 amplitudes by 7.9% at 30 Hz in 991 mouse V1 links with each test mouse excluded
We tested whether a fitted first response strength slope improves prediction of the mean second response in mouse visual cortex. We used Chou and colleagues' optomapping data at 30 Hz. All 1,057 figure records matched the source map files. The main panel had 991 detected excitatory connections, 69 targets, and 39 mice aged 17 to 25 days. Each outer test excluded one entire mouse. Inner mouse groups selected the context penalty. Context included cell type, layers, location, age, and sex. Equal mouse squared log errors were 1.0094 for context alone, 0.5637 for proportional first strength, and 0.5191 for a fitted strength slope. The fitted rule cut error by 48.6% versus context and 7.90% versus proportional strength. The fixed-prediction mouse resample range for the latter gain was 2.16 to 13.33%. A later check repeated all fits in 499 mouse resamples and gave a central range of 0.87 to 16.47%. All main fits reached the original penalty bound. A later wider grid gave a 9.09% gain. Separate target-type tests gave a clear gain for basket targets and uncertain gains for pyramidal and Martinotti targets. The complete-data strength slope was 0.761. The test uses processed mean responses from the same stimulation repeats. It does not identify a release mechanism, predict individual trials, or test anatomical synapse counts. Measurement error, response selection, and the slice protocol limit interpretation. The package contains the unchanged CC0 source archive, a reusable extraction, predictions, a forecast tool, all resamples, figures, source hashes, independent solver checks, and repeat instructions.
mouse visual cortex · optomapping · short-term plasticity · synaptic strength · grouped prediction · paired pulses
References
4- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.5x69p8dc7
We use the unchanged optomapping archive from version ID 338458, version number 4, released 2025-02-08.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100735
This paper describes the optomapping protocol, cell classes, cortical layers, and paired-pulse measurements.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011046
This study examined strength and short-term plasticity in mouse barrel cortex. It gives a prior physiological basis for testing strength calibration.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09608.2001
This work showed that response fluctuations can bias paired-pulse ratio interpretation. We use direct second amplitudes and avoid a release-mechanism claim.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith full initial pools and linear readout, 197 of 608 initially depressing mouse V1 triplets at 30 Hz failed a fixed release and exponential recovery test at an error factor of 1.10
We reuse its checked 991-link cohort and its unchanged MIT source extraction code. We rebuild all pulse amplitudes from the unchanged source ZIP. We test a new three-response model bound.
- usesAt 30 Hz, the second pulse gave no clear mean rise in effective input number in 57 mouse V1 maps with a 0.1 mV cutoff for both pulses
We use its reported complete-data strength slope only for a restricted common power reference. We omit its context terms and response scatter. The samples overlap. We test a different outcome and do not test its full forecast model.
- usesAt 30 Hz, source layer gave no clear added voltage prediction gain after first strength in 991 mouse V1 connections
We reuse its MIT extractor and checked cohort, then test the added value of source-layer information.