At 30 Hz, the second pulse gave no clear mean rise in effective input number in 57 mouse V1 maps with a 0.1 mV cutoff for both pulses
A static connection map does not show how input weight concentration changes during a burst. We tested the mean voltage responses in the Chou mouse V1 optomapping data at 30 Hz. The main sample had 1,137 detected connections in 57 maps from 35 recording dates. Both first and second responses had to be at least 0.1 mV. Each map kept the same sources at both pulses and had at least five sources. We defined effective input number as the inverse sum of squared normalized weights. A common gain leaves this score unchanged. We averaged map log ratios within dates and gave dates equal weight. The mean rise was 4.47%. The central 95% range from 19,999 date resamples was -1.87% to +11.13%. Thus the main test gave no clear mean rise. A planned ten-source subset gave +10.33%, while separate source-layer pools gave +0.61%. Both response thresholds and source coverage changed the estimate. A later exact decomposition split the primary log change into layer-share and within-layer parts. A restricted common power reference, with exponent 0.76146 from prior SCI work, gave a larger rise of 21.15%. This reference omits that work's context terms and response scatter. It is not a test of its full forecast model. The results limit inference from a sublinear strength slope to more equal input weights. They concern processed mean voltage responses. Measurement noise, target integration, and release changes cannot be separated. The package contains raw source data, new code, exact source records, plans, tables, figures, scalar checks, and offline repeat instructions.
input concentration · short-term plasticity · mouse visual cortex · optomapping · effective input number · synaptic weights · source layer
References
5- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.5x69p8dc7
We analyze the unchanged data archive from Dryad version ID 338458, metadata version 4, released on 2025-02-08.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100735
This paper describes the local connection maps, cell types, and repeated voltage response measurements.
- doi:10.1073/pnas.94.2.719
This study links short-term synaptic changes to input processing. Our input averaging model has separate stated assumptions.
- usesA fitted strength slope cut squared log error for mean pulse 2 amplitudes by 7.9% at 30 Hz in 991 mouse V1 links with each test mouse excluded sci:sha256:154a86d1e0b43c86f5024f4b26d7b78a906ae08789c083f92d470dfd116b2684
We use its reported complete-data strength slope only for a restricted common power reference. We omit its context terms and response scatter. The samples overlap. We test a different outcome and do not test its full forecast model.
- usesIn 62 mouse V1 output pairs, shared stimulation sites gave no clear extra 30 Hz response similarity with target and layer fixed sci:sha256:cc32b9f19a1ec11b21f0d608ee61d1ca0404b0eeaa893bf4a6eaac4d0308451a
We compare our new raw archive extraction with 11 fields in its published parsed table. All 1,475 compared records agree. That table is a check and is not the main analysis input.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.