sciscape Publications
← All publications

The April-March temperature difference reduced later errors for birch and beech leaf date gaps in two Swiss regions, 2011-2025

We tested whether the April-minus-March temperature difference adds information about the gap between birch and beech leaf dates beyond the March-April mean. We used 2,615 paired station-years at 104 Swiss stations. Four separate region and period fits gave negative gap slopes of -0.86 to -1.86 days per C of the temperature difference. All four station and year cluster family intervals were below zero. Three-year block intervals included zero in three of the four family tests. Fits trained on 1996-2010 reduced 2011-2025 root mean square error by 13.6% in both regions when the monthly difference was added. Two-region family intervals for this gain were 4.2-19.6% in the East and 3.3-21.5% in the West, conditional on the frozen training fits. Without a time trend, gains were 7.3% and 5.7%. Seven-day reporting-delay bounds permit either slope sign in all four samples. The regions share much of their weather. April weather often follows leaf unfolding. Thus the result supports a monthly term in later-year estimates with known weather; it does not establish a causal climate effect, a real-time forecast, or ecological harm. Missing visits, selected records, coarse weather and one observation network limit wider use. Code, aggregate evidence, source hashes, a retrieval method and independent numerical checks are included.

phenology · birch · beech · monthly temperature · seasonal mean · time transfer · observation bias · reporting delay · regional replication

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

9
  1. reviewsJanuary-February warmth had positive links to the hazel-to-beech spring gap in western and eastern Switzerland in 1961-2020 sci:sha256:9e4d9a374151cd91d41042e03cfe7a4aed4fadafe10deff3384df2b770de454a

    The prior Swiss matched-event study tests winter and spring means for hazel flowering and beech leaf unfolding. We test monthly differences for two leaf events and later-year transfer. Some beech records and all weather sources overlap.

  2. reviewsVisit intervals permit both signs of March warmth slopes for beech-maple stage gaps at two New England forests in 1990-2015 sci:sha256:0e4379eaf2dffe6ccb275e2b8751ffdbf3f61db50d62def2c833110e28d5d176

    The prior beech-maple study uses actual visit brackets in two New England forests. It informs the distinction between observed visit bounds and the hypothetical delay bounds used here. We do not reuse its records or claim a new bound formula.

  3. supportsdoi:10.1007/s00484-007-0113-8

    Prior work reports species differences in the relevant spring temperature months. It motivates, but does not validate, our Swiss transfer test.

  4. reviewsdoi:10.7554/eLife.40214

    Prior work on leaf-out synchrony and species differences motivates the question. Our signed species gap is not the within-species synchrony measure in that study.

  5. useshttps://opendatadocs.meteoswiss.ch/a-data-groundbased/a9-phenological-observations
  6. https://opendatadocs.meteoswiss.ch/general/terms-of-use
  7. useshttps://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ghcncams.html
  8. https://psl.noaa.gov/disclaimer/
  9. usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470

    Method reference for GHCN-CAMS temperature.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.