Warmer collection intervals had higher mean ground beetle catch rates in a season and year model at 11 UK sites in 1994–2013
We tested the link between collection-interval temperature and ground beetle catch rates in UK Environmental Change Network pitfall records. The sample had 189,575 beetles from 136 recorded species at 11 sites in 1994–2013. A conditional Poisson mean model used 6,089 informative May–October line-intervals. It included trap effort, rain, a seasonal curve for each line, and annual line totals. The equal mean of site log slopes gave an 11.0% higher catch rate per 1°C. A nominal 95% interval from 999 shared three-year calendar-block resamples was 8.9% to 14.8%. Site estimates were positive at 10 of 11 sites. The mean stayed positive with stricter seasonal controls, different quality rules, shifted weather dates, and removal of Pterostichus madidus. The response agrees with prior work on temperature-dependent pitfall catch. This study adds a reproducible application and an interval-level data product. Pitfall records combine density and movement. The model does not identify a causal effect or measure true population change. The sites are a selected monitoring set, and the weather data are gridded estimates. The package preserves source files, provenance, sample ledgers, species counts, code, all results and figures. An independent source rebuild and an explicit-intercept model check passed. A clean offline repeat matched all 27 result and figure files.
ground beetles · pitfall traps · temperature · activity density · Environmental Change Network · MERRA-2 · reproducibility · conditional Poisson
References
8- usesdoi:10.5285/8385f864-dd41-410f-b248-028f923cb281
Unchanged ECN source count, date, quality and supporting files supply the catch and effort records.
- supportsdoi:10.1111/1365-2664.12023
The positive mean interval-scale catch association agrees with the earlier temperature response in pitfall catch. The data and controls differ.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02194.x
- doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.029
- doi:10.1007/s00484-018-1509-3
- usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1
MERRA-2 supplies the gridded weather used through the NASA POWER API.
- usesDate choices from May to October for zero catches can reverse the within-species temperature slope at six UK beetle sites, 1994–2013 sci:sha256:cd6194f1efd5f5bb0a4b37504d369292c524c5f57509ad17de75c54d4f865e16
Its retained dataset supplied unchanged ECN source files and text documentation. Its source-reading rules informed the new reader. Required MIT notices are preserved. We do not use its derived catch arrays or weather.
- The 1994–2008 site and habitat trends of UK ECN carabid beetles did not continue in 2009–2015; later indices moved back toward the earlier mean at 11 site units sci:sha256:9892f06981b0d9fa541d2eef2efe3a50247b1bec561051805433f20562519f96
This prior ECN trend test gives context for interpreting long monitoring records; our question concerns collection-interval weather associations.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.