sciscape Publications
← All publications

Date choices from May to October for zero catches can reverse the within-species temperature slope at six UK beetle sites, 1994–2013

We tested the link between April–June temperature and mean May–October beetle catch dates at six UK Environmental Change Network sites in 1994–2013. The fixed sample had 12 transects and 191 complete transect-years. We corrected catches for effort, removed a local linear time trend, and split each annual date difference into dates within species and species catch shares. The mean total slope was −1.08 days per °C. Its nominal joint 95% site and year-block interval was −10.62 to +7.54. The mean direction was uncertain. The split needs a date rule for zero-catch species-years. With observed catches and reference communities fixed, we allowed each such date to vary between the first and last monthly midpoints, days 136.5 and 289.5. Exact coefficient bounds gave a within-species slope from −11.35 to +6.49 days per °C. Feasible date assignments attained both limits. The total slope stayed fixed. Common species alone also permitted both signs, from −6.35 to +1.04. These are bounds on the attribution rule, not confidence intervals or estimates of dates for absent species. The catches alone cannot set the sign of this split under the stated bounds. The package has unchanged source data, independent weather inputs, code, all results, figures and offline repeat instructions. The result concerns a selected site set and a truncated season. Pitfall catches combine activity and density. It does not test onset or identify a climate cause.

ground beetles · phenology · temperature · zero catches · rate decomposition · Environmental Change Network · reproducibility · partial identification

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

8
  1. usesThe mean May–October ground-beetle catch-date shift was uncertain at six UK sites between 1994–2003 and 2004–2013 sci:sha256:d4f98daa701764b6b85a0f37b95e39ea1e5a8ec037d07f2cb36c2fd59528d090

    We reuse the verified raw ECN files, fixed sample, source-index functions and daily audit. We add independent weather and annual response and attribution-bound analyses.

  2. The mean May–October beetle catch date across seven UK ECN sites had no clear shift between 1994–2001 and 2004–2011 sci:sha256:3483ccc1d14dc88e3fc8e934bbe777d29d8333de264e51e69174edd5a03617eb

    Prior ECN community seasonal-date comparison.

  3. The mean May–June beetle capture share change was uncertain at six UK ECN sites in 1994–2013 sci:sha256:c959fc27c85f4dd63bcaf8805db8d9af3753b71c10b5680ccc8b1000a88cda7f

    Prior ECN early-season catch-share comparison.

  4. The 1994–2008 site and habitat trends of UK ECN carabid beetles did not continue in 2009–2015; later indices moved back toward the earlier mean at 11 site units sci:sha256:9892f06981b0d9fa541d2eef2efe3a50247b1bec561051805433f20562519f96

    Earlier ECN abundance-trend analysis and retained source used by the parent timing study.

  5. usesdoi:10.5285/8385f864-dd41-410f-b248-028f923cb281

    Original open ECN carabid count, effort and documentation dataset.

  6. doi:10.1007/s00484-018-1509-3

    Earlier ECN species-onset and temperature study. Its public abstract set the April–June predictor window. Our response is a seasonal mean.

  7. usesdoi:10.1080/01621459.1955.10501299

    Standard symmetric rate-decomposition identity used for annual dates and shares.

  8. usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1

    MERRA-2 underlies the NASA POWER weather inputs used here.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.