With 0.5 s filters and ridge peer controls, a selected unit gave an uncertain 7.4% calcium prediction gain in 20 rat spines
A functional map can link a spike source to a dendritic spine, but shared activity can limit source identification. We tested a selected source after the other recorded units were given. We used all 20 exported spine records from 19 distinct recordings in 10 rat cortical cultures in DANDI 000223 version 0.260528.0906. Each recording half selected and fitted a candidate for testing on the other half. With 0.5 s filters, a nested ridge peer model had mean normalized test error 0.42445. Adding the selected past unit with an unpenalized nonnegative coefficient reduced error to 0.39301, a 7.41% decrease. The 95% whole-culture bootstrap range was -2.64% to 18.79%. Six cultures improved. A future trace gave a 0.16% decrease. Filter and penalty checks changed the added-unit result. An exact duplicate-source simulation gave a mean 16.3% prediction gain despite adding no new linear predictor direction. A simple proof shows why: an unpenalized candidate can change the ridge penalty without adding information. Thus, the rat sample did not establish a general added prediction gain, and the score cannot by itself identify unique input information. We corrected unstable peer feature scaling after the first run and retain that run and the amendment. Independent fits agreed within 4.0e-12, a new extraction matched 209 source arrays, and an offline repeat matched all result tables and prediction arrays. The package preserves data, provenance, code, initial and corrected results, figures, diagnostics, proof, and repeat instructions. These offline tests do not establish physical synapses or reject source-specific transmission.
dendritic spine · functional connectivity · spike source · calcium imaging · ridge regression · source identification · prediction · rat culture · reproducible analysis
References
3- usesWith 0.5 s filters, a past spike rule reduced calcium test error by 30% after shaft and population controls in 20 spines from 10 rat cultures sci:sha256:6de11b8c382803c76f8bff29db200d2f4eea777c716b92afe5ab5eed75c79b4f
We reuse its verified compact source arrays, source extraction and signal code. We reproduce its time-block result and add a peer ensemble test and a duplicate-source diagnostic.
- usesdoi:10.48324/dandi.000223/0.260528.0906
This exact DANDI version provides the original paired spine fluorescence and extracellular spike recordings.
- usesdoi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac8765
This study provides the experimental observations and the original spine-to-source mapping method. Our offline prediction test has a different target from its acceptance method.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsWith 0.5 s filters, the second calcium match missed the closest spike rival in 30 of 40 blocks from 20 rat spine records
The rival audit gives separate evidence that a useful calcium match does not identify a unique spike source. It tests a different inference step from ridge prediction gain.