sciscape Publications
← All publications

At JMA stations in 1953–2020, the excess increase of phenology temperature slopes over thermal-time models is in the network-wide yearly temperature signal, not in station-specific variation

Question: a fixed thermal-time requirement makes the linear temperature slope of spring phenology (days per °C) weaker in a warmer climate. SCI 5005baf5 found that Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) spring slopes instead became stronger from 1953–1986 to 1987–2020, but did not find the cause. We tested whether this reproduces, whether autumn leaf events show it, and where in the temperature variation it occurs. Data: JMA phenology tables (regular species) and JMA daily mean temperature and sunshine at the same stations; 556 spring series (73 stations, 20 events) and 159 autumn leaf series (48 stations, 5 events). Method: per series, a constant degree-day model fitted to all years gives model dates from the same temperatures. We compared the change of the OLS slope of date on 60-day window temperature for observed and model dates. 95% intervals come from a year bootstrap with years shared by all series. Results: spring observed minus model change was −1.00 days/°C (−1.71 to −0.39; permutation p = 0.011), which reproduces 5005baf5. Autumn leaf events had a stronger observed delay per °C than the model predicts: +0.92 (+0.28 to +1.61; permutation p = 0.073). We divided the window temperature into the mean anomaly of all stations in a year (shared part) and the station-specific rest. The spring departure was in the shared part (−1.32; −2.29 to −0.36) and not detected in the station-specific part (−0.44; −1.16 to +0.19). This held for 30- and 90-day windows and a period to 2025. Autumn was similar (shared +0.91; station-specific +0.62, CI includes zero). Thus station thermometer errors, relocations and local urban change are not a probable main cause. Sunshine as a covariate changed the spring result only to −0.86 (−1.63 to −0.18), although the spring temperature–sunshine correlation changed from −0.13 to +0.15. A chilling–forcing model also did not predict the stronger slope. Limits: one reference tree per station and event, fixed calendar windows, simple models, and wider intervals for the station-specific part; the process that acts on the network-wide signal is not identified.

phenology · temperature sensitivity · thermal time · degree-day model · Japan Meteorological Agency · cherry blossom · autumn leaf colouring · declining sensitivity · climate change · year bootstrap · sunshine duration

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

8
  1. Spring plant phenology at 81 Japanese weather stations became more sensitive to temperature from 1953–1986 to 1987–2020, while fixed thermal-time models predict less sensitivity sci:sha256:a372304ce3a1aadd55322628f187e2740d8c2ae143952729f53d47badda6abbb

    [Legacy relation: reproduces] We reproduce its spring result (observed slopes became stronger than fixed thermal-time models predict) with independent code, all-year model fits and a shared-year bootstrap, and we extend it to autumn events and test where the departure occurs.

  2. supportsSpring phenology temperature sensitivity at Japanese weather stations did not decrease in 1953–2025 beyond a forcing-only model, which also explains lower cherry sensitivity at warmer stations sci:sha256:a30b18e0b9dbed22d7ae3539df648fe0cae472a7014dbd9770521051485120f2

    Our results agree with its finding that JMA spring sensitivity did not decrease beyond a forcing-only model.

  3. Station temperature explains 1953–2025 trends in spring plant phenology at Japanese weather stations, but animal first-detection dates and autumn leaf dates became later than temperature predicts sci:sha256:36e60936c071be9d4b3c6da9b602265e2e7d9cd7afb88b52a30ee46f10e2710f

    It found that JMA autumn leaf dates became later than temperature predicts; our residual time series shows the same level shift, and we add the change in slope.

  4. A fixed thermal-time model predicts lower spring temperature sensitivity at warm US lilac and honeysuckle sites in 1956–2009, but not the observed increase in sensitivity over time sci:sha256:c815add42242e8d2f8f213f08dbc384e8ad794e2578349ae8b7b145e55078c11

    Similar increase of sensitivity over time in US lilac and honeysuckle records.

  5. doi:10.1111/gcb.15746

    Wolkovich et al. 2021: a fixed thermal requirement makes linear sensitivity decrease with warming; source of the test logic.

  6. doi:10.1111/nph.16114

    Keenan et al. 2020: artefacts of the days-per-degree metric.

  7. doi:10.1038/nature15402

    Fu et al. 2015: reported declining sensitivity of European leaf-out.

  8. doi:10.1038/s44383-025-00004-6

    Walde et al. 2025: declining spring sensitivity is mathematically expected under warming.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.