sciscape Publications
← All publications

Spring plant phenology at 81 Japanese weather stations became more sensitive to temperature from 1953–1986 to 1987–2020, while fixed thermal-time models predict less sensitivity

Question: is the change in the linear temperature sensitivity of spring phenology in Japan the change that a fixed thermal-time requirement predicts? A fixed degree-day requirement makes the linear sensitivity (days per °C) decrease when the climate becomes warmer (Wolkovich et al. 2021). We used 587 station-event series of Japan Meteorological Agency phenology records (81 stations, 23 flowering and budburst events, 1953–2020) and the daily mean temperature of each station. For each series, we fit a fixed model to the 1953–1986 dates only. Then we calculated the slope of the event date on the 60-day pre-event temperature in 1953–1986 and in 1987–2020, for observed and model dates. The preseason temperature increased by 1.05 °C. The fixed degree-day model predicted a weaker response: +0.42 days/°C (95% CI +0.27 to +0.57, station bootstrap). The observed response became stronger: −0.52 days/°C (−0.83 to −0.18), from −4.78 to −5.30. The difference was −0.94 (−1.24 to −0.63) and was outside the range of fixed-model simulations with resampled residuals (p < 0.001). Sigmoid forcing and chilling–forcing (alternating) models predicted +0.32 and +0.66, so a chilling limit does not explain the result. The result was the same with model fits in 1987–2020 or 1953–2020, a late period to 2025, 45- and 90-day windows, detrending, homogeneous temperature records only, on-site trees only and all filters together. With a 30-day window, the observed change was −0.03 and the model change was +0.55. Cherry flowering and full bloom, wisteria and ginkgo budburst became 0.7–1.0 days/°C more sensitive than the model predicts. Japanese apricot sensitivity decreased, but less than predicted. Japanese lawn grass was the only event with a less sensitive observed response than predicted. Limits: one reference tree per station, often in a city; station air temperature in fixed calendar windows; simple grid-search models; the cause of the increase is not identified. Thus, in these records the predicted artefact of declining sensitivity is not present, and the observed response became stronger.

phenology · temperature sensitivity · thermal time · degree-day model · Japan Meteorological Agency · cherry flowering · climate change · chilling · budburst · out-of-sample test

Admitted 7 citing publications

References

7
  1. usesdoi:10.1111/gcb.15746

    We test the prediction of this paper that a fixed thermal requirement makes linear sensitivity decline with warming; the predicted decline is not found in JMA records.

  2. doi:10.1038/s44383-025-00004-6

    Shows that the apparent decline in sensitivity is expected under a constant thermal sum; we compare observed and model-predicted changes.

  3. doi:10.1038/nature15402

    Reported declining sensitivity of spring leaf unfolding in Europe.

  4. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109571

    Prior analysis of winter and spring warming effects on JMA cherry bloom dates.

  5. usesdoi:10.2307/2403139

    Alternating chilling-forcing model structure used as one of the fixed models.

  6. usesdoi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2178

    Sigmoid forcing rate function used as one of the fixed models.

  7. Station temperature explains 1953–2025 trends in spring plant phenology at Japanese weather stations, but animal first-detection dates and autumn leaf dates became later than temperature predicts sci:sha256:36e60936c071be9d4b3c6da9b602265e2e7d9cd7afb88b52a30ee46f10e2710f

    Same JMA records; found that one linear temperature slope explains spring plant trends. We show that the slope itself changed between 1953-1986 and 1987-2020.

Cited by

7 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.