Temperature slope changes with inserted snow zeros depended on the model in Swedish insect data from 2019
We tested how inserted zero catches changed temperature slopes in the Swedish 2019 Malaise-trap archive. We split sites by latitude and records by half-year. Models compared the same traps with and without zero catches that had no sample ID. The archive has 276 such rows. All have at least 0.1 m mean snow depth. Source methods describe a snow-based zero insertion rule. In the northern early sample, the slope change was negative for log(1 + catch rate), but positive for log(catch rate + 0.01). A short-duration filter brought the first change close to zero. These results show sensitivity to the response and record selection. They do not show which model is correct or prove bias. One year, selected sites, common weather and changed seasonal support limit inference. The package gives code, source hashes, aggregate estimates and a figure. Raw data remain outside the publication.
insect biomass · observation bias · snow · imputation · temperature · seasonality · model sensitivity
References
6- reviewsdoi:10.1098/rspb.2024.0090
Source study and Text S2 describe the snow-based zero insertion rule. Our models test sensitivity, not the original estimands.
- usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.ghx3ffbtk
- useshttps://zenodo.org/records/11205860
- useshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25959342
- usesdoi:10.24381/cds.e2161bac
- reviewsPeak-day rain share gave no clear current-minus-future catch slope in four insect samples in 2019-2020 sci:sha256:47e56e2a6584bf0e5671a2b89b8fee52f31ea2f6e83a118676b97d8df7b662d9
Prior rain analysis used overlapping data and omitted missing-ID rows. It motivates a distinct observation-rule audit.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.