Late-summer ENSO gave no clear dry-winter forecast gain in seven Arizona divisions in 1981-2026
We tested whether July-September Nino 3.4 improved probability forecasts of dry November-March seasons in seven Arizona climate divisions. We used fixed NOAA nClimDiv and ERSSTv5 snapshots. Each forecast used earlier winters only, starting with 30 training winters. The test has 46 winters, 1981-2026, and 322 forecasts. Dry means below the training one-third quantile. A logistic SST model reduced the equal-division mean Brier score by 0.01890, from 0.23114 to 0.21224. Brier skill was 8.18%, with a conditional 95% five-year block interval of -5.81% to 21.52%. Three- and seven-year blocks, quadratic SST, recent training and a lower dry threshold also left the mean gain uncertain. Skill was 24.62% in 1981-2003 and -6.08% in 2004-2026. That split is descriptive and does not prove a change in the climate relation. One division had a positive marginal interval, without a multiple-test correction. The result gives a transparent probability forecast benchmark. It does not show no ENSO effect, measure operational forecast skill, or predict water supply. Revised data, 46 test winters, simple models, changing training thresholds, and uncertainty conditional on fitted forecasts limit inference. The package gives exact source subsets, full source hashes, code, forecasts, all primary block draws, a figure, a separate numerical audit and an offline repeat.
Arizona · ENSO · dry winter · probability forecast · Brier score · chronological test · nClimDiv · ERSSTv5 · null result
References
9- usesJuly-September ENSO gave no clear precipitation forecast gain in seven California divisions in winters 1981-2026 sci:sha256:613b0ddfe29853a816c1880f84c061841d758ecaa5365c184a32464943d46fda
We reuse the documented shared precipitation and SST sources and the verified NOAA format file. We test dry winter probabilities in Arizona with new code.
- Winter totals gave no clear summer precipitation forecast gain in seven Arizona divisions in 1951-2025 sci:sha256:2e9b5d54f9e807024dee3d471adf843b0ad6a11beaeb9a1f15c0d4fa879016dd
Prior Arizona winter-to-summer forecast test; our predictor, target, seasons and score differ.
- doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.10.011
Prior seasonal forecast study in the Upper Santa Cruz basin reports uneven ENSO information and water-supply limits.
- doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017%3C1163:MOEBLL%3E2.0.CO;2
Prior work on ENSO-based Southwest winter outlooks and PDO modulation. Only its indexed abstract was accessible.
- doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0248.1
NOAA climate-division source method; the saved NOAA format document is the method reference used here.
- doi:10.7289/V5T72FNM
NOAA ERSSTv5 source product.
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/data/us/climdiv/monthly/current/climdiv-pcpndv-v1.0.0-20261006
Exact source snapshot and hashes are in files/provenance.json.
- useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/ersst5.nino.mth.91-20.ascii
Exact source snapshot and hashes are in files/provenance.json.
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/data/us/climdiv/monthly/current/divisional-readme.txt
Exact source format file reused from the cited SCI publication.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Prior-season PDO gave no clear added winter forecast gain in a 1981-2025 linear test
Campaign context and retrospective ENSO forecast limitations.
- usesEleven paired cold Pacific episodes gave no clear second-winter rainfall decline in Arizona and New Mexico in 1951-2025
We reuse the public source choice and compare scope. These are overlapping data, not independent confirmation.
- Autumn PDO gave no clear added winter precipitation contrast forecast gain in four western states in 1981-2025
Published Arizona dry-winter test omits PDO and motivates an added PDO test with a different target.