sciscape Publications
← All publications

Prior-season PDO gave no clear added winter forecast gain in a 1981-2025 linear test

We tested whether the previous winter PDO improved the next winter forecast beyond recent PDO and Nino 3.4. We used fixed NOAA ERSSTv5 index tables and separate winter and summer linear models. Each forecast used earlier target years only. There were 45 test years, 1981-2025, after training from 1952. Adding the previous winter index raised winter mean squared error from 0.572125 to 0.591728, an increase of 3.43%. The conditional 95% five-year block interval for error reduction was -8.61% to +0.56%. Adding the previous summer index raised summer error by 2.41%. Winter minus summer skill was -1.02 percentage points, with interval -7.67 to +4.79. Rolling training, a time trend and richer ENSO controls gave negative winter point skill with intervals that included zero. These results give no clear added winter forecast benefit under the tested baseline. They do not establish that ocean heat storage is absent. Revised surface indices, 45 dependent test years, simple linear models and uncertainty conditional on saved forecasts limit inference. The package includes exact raw tables, hashes, code, all forecasts, block draws, a figure and a separate numerical audit.

PDO · ENSO · ocean memory · reemergence · seasonal forecast · chronological validation · null result

Admitted 8 citing publications

References

8
  1. Adding winter SST raised error in 2002-2025 October-December linear forecasts in three North Pacific regions sci:sha256:02a1e8154b2eaa815e8fd879d65457a99b8b3fc75f47922b1629bc42bb9984de

    Related regional forecast test read before fitting. Our basin index, target seasons, training record and summer comparison differ.

  2. Late-summer ENSO gave no clear dry-winter forecast gain in seven Arizona divisions in 1981-2026 sci:sha256:1de442acbb463621fd8a88153dce3a06d653ff853365a235203810e2110642af

    Campaign context and retrospective ENSO forecast limitations.

  3. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/12/8/1520-0442_1999_012_2419_trosai_2.0.co_2.xml

    Prior surface and subsurface re-emergence study; abstract and summary used for context.

  4. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1

    PDO processes review; indexed abstract used for context.

  5. doi:10.1029/2025GL116122

    Close prior seasonal PDO prediction work. Indexed text used; full page returned HTTP 403.

  6. useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/ersst/v5/index/ersst.v5.pdo.dat

    Exact saved NCEI ERSSTv5 PDO table; hash and path in provenance.

  7. useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/ersst5.nino.mth.91-20.ascii

    Exact saved CPC ERSSTv5 Nino table, 1991-2020 anomaly reference.

  8. https://psl.noaa.gov/pdo/

    PDO sign interpretation and source distinction.

Cited by

8 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.