The 2020-2025 mean PDO fell below pre-2020 memory and ENSO model ranges
We tested the mean strength of the negative Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) period in 2020-2025. The observed mean was -1.995. A monthly memory and lagged Nino 3.4 model fitted through 2019 gave a simulation mean of -0.335 and a central 95% range of -0.995 to 0.348. None of 9,999 simulated means was as low as the observation. The simulation used the observed ENSO history, sampled training-row blocks for coefficient variation, and sampled residual blocks for future errors. Fixed coefficients, 3- and 24-month blocks, training from 1980, and an exploratory trend check also gave zero lower-tail counts. Omitting ENSO gave three counts. Earlier fixed-coefficient checks missed nine of 35 overlapping six-year means. Thus this result exposes a limit of the tested statistical reference; it does not establish a new regime or a physical cause. The interval was selected from a known sign run. Conditional simulation, incomplete slow memory, one revised surface index and approximate uncertainty limit inference. The package includes raw snapshots, provenance, code, simulation evidence, two figures and an independent numerical audit.
PDO · ENSO · North Pacific · sustained anomaly · model check · ocean memory
References
7- usesA 72-month negative PDO run had tail fractions of 0.029 and 0.114 under pre-2020 and full-record models sci:sha256:23d96dfe0125a55e2e816fcc8f7ed0182dfcdf21af07b509aa354fddb0bb5d2d
The published run test sets the interval and motivates a mean-strength test. Inputs overlap; this is not independent confirmation.
- Prior-season PDO gave no clear added winter forecast gain in a 1981-2025 linear test sci:sha256:ba062e27488cefb2d07500106a73b9c61ccdaa1cfb319feaaedda15f211bb2c8
Prior seasonal memory benchmark uses the same source snapshots.
- doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1
- doi:10.1002/joc.70092
- https://psl.noaa.gov/people/gilbert.p.compo/Newmanetal2003.pdf
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/ersst/v5/index/ersst.v5.pdo.dat
- useshttps://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/ersst5.nino.mth.91-20.ascii
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA recent mean correction gave no clear six-month PDO forecast gain in 1981-2025
Published six-year model mismatch motivates the mean correction test. Source snapshots overlap; this is not independent confirmation.
- usesAdding a 12-month PDO lag did not remove the 2020-2025 mean mismatch in conditional models
Prior six-year mismatch test sets this extension; data and selected recent period overlap.
- usesObserved PNA did not remove the 2020-2025 mean PDO mismatch in a short-memory model
Extends the sustained-mean test with a new observed PNA input. New code uses the same shared ocean index files.