sciscape Publications
← All publications

Whole-week first-to-full-bloom peaks were uncertain in four US lilac samples in 1965-2008

We tested whether first-to-full-bloom intervals had local peaks at whole weeks in historical US lilac records. We used 8,384 pairs in four region and period samples. The excess at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days relative to immediate neighbors was 0.60 to 2.85 percentage points. All four state-plus-year cluster intervals included zero after correction for four tests. Alternative neighbors, omission of the seven-day center, equal plant weights, first-bloom flag removal, short-record inclusion and state omissions also gave uncertain results. This extends an earlier leaf-to-bloom diagnostic to a shorter stage interval. It does not establish weekly visits or absence of observation bias. Unknown visits, selected long records, few clusters, different plant types and the assumed local shape of biological gap frequencies limit inference. We provide paired records, a raw-source rebuild, code, source hashes, all estimates and figures. We estimate no climate or pollution effect.

phenology · lilac · observation bias · weekly reporting · flower development · null result

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

8
  1. usesFull-bloom selection gave small estimated spring-slope changes in four US lilac samples in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:132840ebfe63249d57d74b600b7334d0c4d104206635ed88c4eb141fa7daa5b7

    Paired panel and adapted raw-source build rules.

  2. usesWhole-week leaf-to-bloom peaks were uncertain in four US plant samples in 1965-2008 sci:sha256:cce229c70fee4ae45139cce3267496b5a755657c60825b80c9a48b39d0bf936f

    We extend its local gap-frequency diagnostic from leaf-to-bloom to first-to-full bloom.

  3. reviewsEastern US lilac bloom records had fewer weekend dates than the calendar reference in 1965-1986 sci:sha256:3ba3a680e9d4b32e49b480eb66b0f3b9eff52c00776bf1259988bf4be3263615

    Prior calendar test in overlapping first-bloom records.

  4. usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2015.38

    Source archive and observation definitions.

  5. usesdoi:10.5061/dryad.0262m

    Source dataset.

  6. useshttps://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5499b905e4b093dfafda3575

    Exact shared source snapshots.

  7. reviewsdoi:10.1007/s00484-012-0598-7

    Prior weekend observation-bias test.

  8. reviewsdoi:10.1007/s00484-023-02502-7

    Context on temporal observation bias.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.