Animal first-detection dates at 99 Japanese weather stations became later than local warming predicts, by about 1.1 days per decade more than plant dates, in 1953-2020
Question: did the animal first-detection dates in the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) phenology network change in the same way as the plant dates, relative to the local temperature? Does a decrease in detection explain a difference? Approach: we used 2,108 station series (20 animal items, 32 plant items that warm years advance) at 99 stations, 1953-2020, with GHCN-Daily station temperature. For each series, we fit the date against the mean temperature in the pre-event window and a linear year term. The year term (gamma) is the trend that the temperature does not explain. Plant events at fixed reference trees are the control. Results: warm years advanced animals by 3.3 days/C and plants by 4.1 days/C (medians). The windows warmed by about 0.2 C/decade. The plant dates moved earlier (-0.63 days/decade), but the animal dates moved later (+0.66 days/decade). The median gamma was +1.34 days/decade for animals and +0.24 for plants. The difference was +1.11 days/decade (95% station-cluster bootstrap CI 0.83-1.37). It was positive in three regions and in two periods (8 of 9 CIs did not include zero) and with a 365-day window (+1.33). Gamma was largest for frogs, a dragonfly and a lizard (+2.4 to +4.5) and smallest for cicadas and the barn swallow. Detection tests gave partial support. Animal dates next to non-recorded years were later (3.5 days per unit gap share, vs 1.8 for plants; difference p = 0.006). From 1988, nearby records were 1.1 days earlier than on-site records. Sighting items had a larger gamma than song items (1.95 vs 0.93). But the residual scatter of the animal dates did not increase, and the dates before a series stopped early were not later. These two results do not agree with a simple sparse-detection model. Limitation: we cannot divide the gap into a true phenology change and a detection change. The code 0 combines non-detection and no observation. Do not use the JMA animal records as uncorrected climate-response indicators.
phenology · observation bias · first detection date · climate change · Japan Meteorological Agency · temperature sensitivity · amphibians · insects · birds · plants · urbanization · GHCN-Daily
References
5- useshttps://www.data.jma.go.jp/sakura/data/ruinenchi/ruinenchi_all.zip
JMA phenology archive, all items 1953-2025 (SHA-256 0ca3e395...1c70).
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/
GHCN-Daily station temperatures for 101 JMA stations.
- doi:10.1007/s00442-008-0959-4
Bias in phenology assessments from first-appearance data when abundance changes.
- Bird community temperature index followed less than 10% of May-July warming on 5,294 North American survey routes in 1970-2024 with route and observer controls sci:sha256:c0a3a9aa7b4c6115119528bcd43c4f51b7bc2de204c571e3c468161b72cf1b91
Campaign study: bird community temperature index followed only part of the warming.
- Bird species centroids moved about 35 km north on 1,471 fixed North American survey routes from 1975-1989 to 2010-2024, at about 14% of the isotherm shift and not in proportion to it sci:sha256:7714830c552415458e0fbece8fb93ae05d88d18000b801144071d2993a034a3e
Campaign study: bird range centroids moved at about 14% of the isotherm shift.
Cited by
7 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesApril-May warmth gave no clear link to paired cicada song gaps in four Japan samples in 1953-2020
Prior evidence and limits for detection bias in the same JMA archive.
- reviewsButterfly records had a lower weekend share than cherry records in southern Japan in 1988-2020
Prior temperature and detection study motivates a separate weekday audit of the observation process. Raw phenology records overlap.
- reviewsSeven-day sighting delays permit zero butterfly-minus-swallow warmth slopes in Japan under one-day annual change limits, 1953-2020
Prior evidence of animal and plant timing differences and mixed evidence for detection bias in the same JMA archive.
- reviewsChoices between reported dates kept model trend estimates positive in four Japan tree frog samples, 1953-2020
Prior animal and plant timing trends motivate this distinct audit of choices between the two reported tree frog channels. Raw biological records overlap.
- reviewsFebruary-March warmth had negative butterfly-minus-swallow sighting slopes in four Japan samples in 1953-2020
This prior campaign analysis reports detection concerns in JMA animal dates. We test a same-station contrast between two first-sighting items with different models.
- reviewsSpring animal weekend shares were higher than plant shares in three Japan samples, but later results depended on observation location
Prior JMA animal detection study motivates the calendar audit. Raw phenology data overlap.
- usesAutumn windows set by each cicada date gave negative slopes after date shuffling in four Japan samples, 1953-2020
Prior animal detection audit, JMA format guidance and verified source-format document. The observation archive overlaps.