Choices between reported dates kept model trend estimates positive in four Japan tree frog samples, 1953-2020
We tested whether a choice between reported first sight and first call dates could remove later timing in Japanese tree frog records. We used 1,915 station-years at 66 Japan stations in 1953-2020. Four region and period models held station and January-April mean temperatures constant. Exact bounds allowed either reported date in each year, or one fixed priority per station. All time trend ranges stayed positive. Their endpoints were +2.26 to +7.16 days per decade across samples. Spring temperature ranges stayed negative. One corrected statistical interval for the earliest-rule trend included zero. Of 1,981 source report-years, only 241 had both channels, and 187 pairs had equal dates. Thus, these bounds cannot measure the effect of unreported channels or total observation bias. The result does not prove later breeding or a causal climate effect. The package gives source extracts, a weather-linked panel, code, proofs, all estimates, independent numerical checks and a figure.
phenology · Japanese tree frog · observation bias · first detection · date definition · partial identification · temperature · reproducible data
References
10- reviewsAnimal first-detection dates at 99 Japanese weather stations became later than local warming predicts, by about 1.1 days per decade more than plant dates, in 1953-2020 sci:sha256:25581ede440edd79d3b5549f9356af2671302c458326692ce9859e87cbe76d7a
Prior animal and plant timing trends motivate this distinct audit of choices between the two reported tree frog channels. Raw biological records overlap.
- reviewsJapanese animal first-appearance dates were 5.8 days later per unit share of nearby no-record years in four regions and two periods, 1953-2020; plant dates showed 1.3 days sci:sha256:71c9a88e131601688998df1d3411dc9b9686fda6cd835ba5a8dc1530c1f4c57e
Prior no-record-year analysis motivates attention to detection. Our bounds do not correct missing channels.
- useshttps://www.data.jma.go.jp/sakura/data/ruinenchi/ruinenchi_all.zip
JMA archive. Items 114 and 115 give first call and first sight. The exact snapshot and member hashes are preserved.
- useshttps://www.data.jma.go.jp/sakura/data/ruinenchi/format_ruinenchi.pdf
Source CSV format, station codes, date and remark fields.
- useshttps://www.data.jma.go.jp/sakura/data/kyu_shishin.pdf
The 2011 manual, sections 4.16 and 5.1, distinguishes tree frog first sight and first call.
- useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/noaa/isd-history.csv
Exact WMO station match supplies coordinates. The shared snapshot hash is recorded.
- useshttps://downloads.psl.noaa.gov/Datasets/ghcncams/air.mon.mean.nc
GHCN-CAMS monthly temperature. The version 3.01 snapshot hash is recorded.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
Method for the gridded monthly temperature data.
- reviewshttps://esj.ne.jp/meeting/abst/59/P2-286A.html
Prior conference study of tree frog calling dates proposes a humidity explanation for later calls.
- reviewsdoi:10.1890/13-1830.1
Prior method separates detection and timing through repeated observations. The present archive does not supply those observations.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.