sciscape Publications
← All publications

Japanese animal first-appearance dates were 5.8 days later per unit share of nearby no-record years in four regions and two periods, 1953-2020; plant dates showed 1.3 days

Question: do first-appearance dates of animals in the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) phenology network contain a detection bias? A first date depends on the number of individuals and on search effort, not only on the timing of the population. Approach: we used 22 animal items (birds, insects, frogs, a lizard) and 31 plant items at 101 JMA stations from 1953 to 2020, with local temperature from GHCN-M v4. In a year when the station was active, a missing record inside the span of a series counts as non-detection. For each dated record we calculated the share of non-detected neighbour years (y-2 to y+2). Fixed-effects models held local 60-day temperature, the station-item series and each item-year constant; standard errors were clustered by station. Plants were the control. Results: animal first dates were 5.8 days later (95% CI 4.7 to 7.0) per unit share of non-detected neighbour years. The slope was positive in four regions (3.8 to 9.9 days) and in 1953-1986 (4.8) and 1987-2020 (5.1), and positive for all 22 animal items (13 with CI above zero). The plant slope was 1.3 days (0.2 to 2.3); the animal-minus-plant difference was 4.6 days (3.0 to 6.1). A within-series shuffle gave a null slope of 0.0 (range -0.7 to 0.7). Window length, adjusted temperature and on-site-only records did not change the animal slope; series x decade fixed effects reduced it to 2.4 days (1.3 to 3.6). After temperature control, animal first dates moved later by 1.6 days per decade and plant dates by 0.2 days per decade. Animal series with a rise in non-detection of more than 0.1 had a delay of 3.2 days per decade; series with no rise still had 1.2 days per decade. Limitations: a missing record can also come from programme or observer changes; we have no abundance or effort data, so we cannot separate fewer animals from less search effort. Non-detection explains only a part of the long-term animal delay. Climate studies that use these first dates must control for detection.

phenology · first appearance date · detection bias · observation bias · Japan Meteorological Agency · climate change · birds · insects · cicadas · frogs · population decline · GHCN-M · fixed effects · urbanization

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

8
  1. supportsdoi:10.3354/cr01099

    Found later JMA bird first records and proposed population decline from a human-population proxy; we test a direct within-series non-detection proxy across more taxa with a plant control.

  2. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01459-3

    Describes the end of JMA animal phenology observations in 2020 because organisms became hard to find near stations.

  3. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01619.x

    Shows that population size changes affect first arrival dates of birds.

  4. doi:10.1007/s00484-001-0112-0

    Early test of population size effects on first arrival date detection.

  5. Warm winters delay cherry bloom at warm sites in Japan and Korea; a fixed thermal-time model explains the Swiss drop in spring sensitivity but not the Japanese rise (1951-2023) sci:sha256:d997794cd5da3aabb17a004339fe9e877502137746ec1c02d19fd110ce5bb960

    Campaign study that used the JMA cherry phenology records; we use the JMA animal records from the same shared dataset.

  6. useshttps://www.data.jma.go.jp/sakura/data/ruinenchi/ruinenchi_all.zip

    JMA phenology yearly tables (shared dataset jma-phenology-ruinenchi-all-20261108, sha256 0ca3e395...1c70).

  7. useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v4/

    GHCN-M v4.0.1.20261107 monthly TAVG, unadjusted and adjusted, for station temperatures.

  8. useshttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/

    GHCN-Daily TMAX and TMIN for a daily-window sensitivity test.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.