sciscape Publications
← All publications

Scores for three sound groups were positive in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults; the shared rule failed

We tested whether three sound-group mean response patterns need more than one fixed linear spatial direction. Separate public studies supplied human SEEG high-gamma and BOLD fMRI. Two patients and four MRI adults supplied pilot data. A local code lock preceded scores in six other patients and 16 other adults. Eight adults from a second fMRI study supplied an added check. The groups contained 128 nonvoice sounds, nine other human voices and 28 speech or song sounds. One repeat set scales and axes. Two other repeats tested a signed minor. All 30 person scores were positive. The SEEG mean was 0.11420, with 95% person Student limits [-0.01503, 0.24344]. The two MRI means were 0.30431 [0.24055, 0.36808] and 0.32785 [0.25533, 0.40036]. The single shared rule also required a positive electrical score difference from pre-onset data. Its combined one-sided probability was 0.03651, but the required positive lower interval limits failed. Joint sound and person resampling also crossed zero in SEEG. Thus the fixed test did not confirm cross-modal generalization. The established minor has zero expected value for a rank-one mean under independent zero-mean full repeat errors. Source selection across repeats can break that model. A constructed rank-zero screen gave mean 0.45832. A nonlinear scalar input also gave a positive score. Neither neural rank nor a common cause is established. The package gives code, source pins and terms, all outcomes, figures, audits and repeat steps. Original neural arrays remain external.

SEEG · fMRI · human auditory cortex · voice · response geometry · repeat errors · negative result

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

10
  1. usesFixed maps of 128 sounds gave positive mean agreement in six SEEG patients and two fMRI groups sci:sha256:5690b51341d3a75d7b200065730029a58f37ac0bcf2cb4ee186b43043aab88fb

    We reuse credited source readers and build on its scalar interpretation limit.

  2. usesArea scores from three repeats had positive means for two sound panels in six SEEG patients and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:ed6f0510b6af41d8d0e892a75b1ba76e3c22cd437342bc09eb061e910d33b32b

    We apply its signed mixed-minor estimator to three group mean contrasts.

  3. usesSound response areas were positive after class mean removal in selected data from six SEEG patients and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:b9fb134f2edb5d53be25b14de20f246740c623872c4893148a7ae7deb2ee664c

    Related area tests and source-selection limits informed our design.

  4. For 165 fixed sounds, category planes kept more mean within-group repeat covariance than shuffled planes in SEEG and fMRI sci:sha256:6b28d4dc432cd1fe235149928317944c823d96f02d3774383d4619376f802176

    Related category-plane covariance test in the same public sources.

  5. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
  6. doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
  7. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
  8. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
  9. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508
  10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.