sciscape Publications
← All publications

Sound response areas were positive after class mean removal in selected data from six SEEG patients and two fMRI cohorts

We tested whether stable sound differences after broad-class centering can exceed one fixed linear response dimension. Separate public studies supplied three-repeat SEEG high-gamma and BOLD fMRI responses. One repeat fitted two directions. The two other repeats tested a mixed area. A fixed linear rank-one signal has expected area zero under independent zero-mean repeat errors. Development used two patients and four adults. Fixed tests used six other patients and sixteen other adults. Mean areas were 0.022164 and 0.022862, with 95% person intervals [0.012028,0.032300] and [0.015008,0.030715]. All people were positive. Eight adults from a second fMRI study gave mean 0.014611 [0.009636,0.019586]. The shared mean p was 0.00123370; a conservative two-claim Holm value was 0.00246740. Common sound-and-person resampling kept positive ranges. The speech-and-song-only SEEG interval included zero. The before-onset electrical mean was near zero. Independent solvers agreed within 4.45e-16. In a rank-one simulation, selecting sites by repeat reliability gave positive area. The six-record gate rate was 29.43%, versus 2.03% without selection. The fMRI sources had prior reliability selection, so the human result does not establish neural rank above one. These are fixed-panel tests in reused, selected cohorts. Cohort differences, unequal sampling, shared processing and measurement filters limit transfer. We supply code, source versions and terms, all scores, uncertainty, simulations, figures and repeat instructions. Original source arrays remain external.

human neuroscience · SEEG · fMRI · auditory responses · dimensionality · repeat reliability · selection bias · mixed determinant

Admitted 6 citing publications

References

14
  1. usesSpeech and song axes gave positive mean repeat scores for nine voice clips in SEEG and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:6720e49a50bda02902607508181e2616c7f5e48b21bceee56a2d3fcdc618bdae

    Reuse source pins, MIT source reconstruction code, three-block handling and fMRI anatomical site rule.

  2. usesFor two fixed non-vocal sound panels, pair relations agreed across 15 iEEG patients and 12 fMRI adults after one training pattern was removed sci:sha256:500f341c2503f97fb7e148d77c129827d6629d5f629f1c98e78185fbc0dbd66a

    Its rank-one counterexample motivates a repeat-separated area test; no neural input reused.

  3. With clipped acoustic inputs, rank 2 models had lower mean test error than rank 1 for fixed panels from 20 iEEG patients and 20 fMRI adults sci:sha256:a7ebe1050fc6e865343e629ad39c22ef72edc352e2f1390afdc35c73a0231229

    Related acoustic rank comparison. Present assay uses different electrical data and a conditional rank-one area null.

  4. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
  5. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
  6. doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
  7. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
  8. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
  9. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726
  10. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.062
  11. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.015
  12. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005508
  13. doi:10.7554/eLife.82566
  14. doi:10.1038/nn.2303

Cited by

6 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.