sciscape Publications
← All publications

Fixed nonvoice sound contrasts gave positive mean repeat areas in six SEEG patients and sixteen fMRI adults

We tested whether sound responses have a positive mean spatial area in separate human SEEG and fMRI studies. A single fixed linear response direction has zero expected corrected area under independent errors across sound and repeat observations. We used disjoint contrasts among 128 fixed source nonvoice sounds per study. One repeat set site scales; two other repeats supplied a quartic area estimate. No fitted response direction or common reference person entered the score. A local code lock preceded reserved endpoint scores. Six SEEG patients had mean 0.002810, with 95% person Student limits [0.000255, 0.005365]. Sixteen fMRI adults had mean 0.042440 [0.029782, 0.055098]. The fixed shared gate passed, one-sided p=0.018388 at threshold 0.025. One patient was negative. Eight adults from a separate fMRI study had mean 0.030627 [0.016391, 0.044863]. All studies had uncertain first-sixteen-site checks. Joint person and sound reweighting crossed zero in SEEG. An exact sum replaces 256032000 ordered quartet evaluations with quadratic work after Gram formation. Direct enumeration and independent contrast calculations checked it. Models showed positive area under rank-one site selection and under rank-zero errors related across sounds. The human results therefore concern the stated measured preparations; they do not establish two neural sources or a cause. Clinical sampling, different cohorts and filters, source selection, fixed sounds and small electrical n limit scope. Code, source pins and terms, all scores, negative checks, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Original neural arrays stay external.

human auditory cortex · SEEG · fMRI · response area · neural dimensionality · cross-validation · U-statistic · independent errors

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

14
  1. usesFixed maps of 128 sounds gave positive mean agreement in six SEEG patients and two fMRI groups sci:sha256:5690b51341d3a75d7b200065730029a58f37ac0bcf2cb4ee186b43043aab88fb

    We build on its sound geometry result and scalar limit.

  2. usesFor 128 nonvoice sounds per study and fixed references, mean repeat area scores were positive in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:200641dbb520b35d79aa7a618d469b63a67f22fb52ce49c4f7c09bd72b569da4

    Its common-reference area limit motivates a person-wise test with no shared reference.

  3. usesSound response areas were positive after class mean removal in selected data from six SEEG patients and two fMRI cohorts sci:sha256:b9fb134f2edb5d53be25b14de20f246740c623872c4893148a7ae7deb2ee664c

    We build on its response-area benchmark and preserve its source-selection limit.

  4. usesFixed tests did not confirm more than one category response direction in 14 SEEG patients and five fMRI adults sci:sha256:d1c3867aa2d720763d349b929e0f96b7c1c4288e4a6dc515a021efb5a5e2d48f

    We adapt its disjoint-contrast estimator and reproduce its sound-error independence limit.

  5. usesA fixed test did not confirm shared sound distinctiveness in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults sci:sha256:0234e83c1567b3fbb5ca880b3a2ecfc5a8b31abb0b992faaf1803d6f2ac288ac

    We use its MIT fetch code, source-reader structure and exact source pins.

  6. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.062
  7. doi:10.1214/12-AOS993
  8. doi:10.7554/eLife.82566
  9. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
  10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
  11. doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
  12. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
  13. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
  14. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349726

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.