sciscape Publications
← All publications

One added early event made a Puerto Rico spatial spread increase uncertain at M3 or more on days 1-30 in 2020

We tested whether the spatial spread of a fixed USGS Puerto Rico catalog increased from days 1-7 to days 7-30 after 7 January 2020. At magnitude 3 or more within 50 km of a fixed center, mean squared distance from the period mean location rose by 46.55 km squared. The conditional 95% two-day block interval was 6.36 to 77.00. Extending the radius to 100 km added one early M3.3 event at 96.16 km. The spread change then fell to 1.62 km squared, with an interval of -136.43 to 77.02. An exact single-event calculation accounts for this change. The estimate at magnitude 3.5 or more and the estimate without a window around the 11 January M5.9 event also had intervals that included zero. Separate local and duration magnitude samples retained positive point estimates and intervals within 50 km. Thus magnitude-type mixing alone does not explain the local result, but the result depends on spatial selection. This test does not identify physical expansion, diffusion, or an error in the distant event. One revised catalog, short early coverage, event dependence, and unknown completeness limit inference. The package gives raw data, code, all planned checks, block draws, and an independent arithmetic audit.

Puerto Rico · aftershocks · spatial spread · catalog selection · influence · block bootstrap

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

7
  1. usesSix-hour controls reduced a short-gap spatial excess in a 2020 Puerto Rico earthquake catalog sample sci:sha256:a8a61b1966783d2ac7abd2b0e9b54b80d29c3ba0c8a811443548ceb86a57fb33

    We read its public spatial control study and reuse the same shared source. We test period spatial moments, not short-gap pairs. The data overlap.

  2. usesChanging magnitude-type weights account for most of a larger-event share drop in a 2020 Puerto Rico catalog sample sci:sha256:877dd6cab9c334046494dd4942612b8ee1df3580801da99c6bc4969dbf39c5c1

    We read its magnitude mixture study. It motivates separate ML and MD checks.

  3. doi:10.1785/0120220229

    Prior enhanced-catalog study of complex fault activity in this sequence. We use the USGS abstract for context; we do not use its enhanced catalog.

  4. doi:10.1785/0220210222

    Prior aftershock forecast study. We found the USGS publication record; we do not evaluate its ETAS forecasts.

  5. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/data/comcat/

    ComCat contains source parameters from contributing networks.

  6. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/

    Data service and query format.

  7. useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2020-01-07T08%3A24%3A26&endtime=2020-02-06T08%3A24%3A26&latitude=17.916&longitude=-66.813&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2.5&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000

    Exact source query. The saved hash defines the version used.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.