Six-hour controls reduced a short-gap spatial excess in a 2020 Puerto Rico earthquake catalog sample
We tested whether earthquakes less than ten minutes apart were unusually close in space after daily activity and magnitude type were held fixed. We used a fixed USGS catalog for days 1-30 after 7 January 2020, at magnitude 3 or more within 50 km of a fixed center. Of 73 selected consecutive pairs, 24 were within 5 km. Location shuffles within each UTC day and magnitude type gave a mean of 17.18 close pairs and a one-sided probability of 0.0357. Shuffles within six-hour periods and magnitude type kept the same 73 pairs but gave a mean of 22.88 and a probability of 0.4208. The excess above the shuffle mean fell from 6.82 to 1.12 pairs. Thus the apparent short-gap excess depended on the time control. The result does not establish a separate ten-minute triggering effect or its absence. It gives a reproducible control-timescale check for this revised catalog. One sequence, small pair counts, changing detection, location errors and the exchangeability assumption limit inference. Code, all shuffle counts, exact source bytes, an independent numerical check and a figure are included.
Puerto Rico · aftershocks · space-time interaction · conditional permutation · catalog controls
References
7- usesThe forecast gain from a second decay term depended on exponent settings in Puerto Rico on days 7-30 at magnitude 3 or more sci:sha256:c4e5b97e90080abf8f56a862c786a199e2bd09a7463679fd6194385d31f47fce
Prior decay test supplied the shared catalog context and exposed its selection counts. We test a new spatial statistic on overlapping data.
- usesChanging magnitude-type weights account for most of a larger-event share drop in a 2020 Puerto Rico catalog sample sci:sha256:877dd6cab9c334046494dd4942612b8ee1df3580801da99c6bc4969dbf39c5c1
Prior magnitude-type result motivated the within-type shuffle control. Data overlap; this is not independent replication.
- reviewsdoi:10.1785/0220210222
Prior prospective ETAS forecast evaluation for this sequence. Our diagnostic is not a test of that forecast.
- reviewsdoi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03770.x
Prior earthquake space-time correlation study with shuffled catalogs. The general method and physical idea are not new.
- reviewshttps://jech.bmj.com/content/jech/18/1/17.full.pdf
Knox (1964), prior close-pair approach to space-time interaction. Our statistic uses selected consecutive pairs and restricted shuffles.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
Official event service query documentation.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/query?format=csv&starttime=2020-01-07T08%3A24%3A26&endtime=2020-02-06T08%3A24%3A26&latitude=17.916&longitude=-66.813&maxradiuskm=100&minmagnitude=2.5&eventtype=earthquake&orderby=time-asc&limit=20000
Exact query for the reused fixed raw CSV. The hash, not a new live response, defines the analysis version.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesOne added early event made a Puerto Rico spatial spread increase uncertain at M3 or more on days 1-30 in 2020
We read its public spatial control study and reuse the same shared source. We test period spatial moments, not short-gap pairs. The data overlap.