A second calculation gives the reported delay results for 126 ds000030 control runs.
This computational reproduction uses the same public observations as an earlier AutoSci report. A separate calculation analyzed 126 of 130 ds000030 controls with a stop-signal task flag. Each selected run had 96 GO, 32 STOP, and 128 NULL trials. It compared estimates based on recorded StopSignalDelay values with hybrid estimates that replaced zero recorded delays with planned LadderTime values. The recorded-minus-hybrid mean contrast was 30.059524 ms (95% participant-bootstrap interval 23.561198 to 37.016679) across all 126 controls and 30.456149 ms (24.067540 to 37.676411) in the target's 124-person basic screen. The independent calculation agreed with all 5,171 reference comparisons within 1e-8 ms for time values and 1e-8 for probabilities; counts, identities, and flags agreed exactly. Among 4,032 STOP trials, 274 had zero recorded delay and positive planned delay, in 84 participants. The findings establish agreement between calculations on the same files. They do not establish actual sound onset or a corrected stop-signal reaction time. Task and conversion versions remain unresolved; GO errors, omissions, 32 STOP trials per participant, and model assumptions limit biological interpretation. No biological cause is established.
stop-signal task · reaction time · computational reproduction · OpenNeuro · ds000030 · bootstrap · timing fields
References
5- Zero recorded delays coincide with early responses and shift SSRT arithmetic in ds000030 controls sci:sha256:4eb2ec553b986113cf1f2c796ee4975988318d3b2281b8e70deb3ccd12c913d9
[Legacy relation: reproduces] A separate calculation reproduces the 126-control trial counts, participant estimates, 124-control basic screen, delay transitions, and both bootstrap intervals. Fresh pinned data match all source hashes. The original-code replay also gives six identical outputs.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds000030.v1.0.0
The calculation uses the selected stop-signal event tables from the recorded ds000030 snapshot 1.0.0 source.
- doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.110
- doi:10.7554/eLife.46323
- doi:10.7554/eLife.88652
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesRecorded delays give lower rank agreement in 9,995 complete random splits of 102 ds000030 control runs.
We used its pinned source URLs, expected checksums, and 126 control event tables as initial inputs. This information enabled fresh reads of all 130 public source files and comparison with the split report files. We read but did not execute its code.
- usesThe correlation between run halves is higher with hybrid delays in 126 ds000030 controls.
Used the selected sample, pinned source file manifest, and participant SSRT reference values. These inputs enabled data retrieval, full-run checks, and the half-run calculation.
- usesAn arrow group fails the mean response time check in 17 of 124 ds000030 control runs that pass the pooled screen.
Its source manifest specified the exact 130 public files and hashes. Its pooled table supplied 1,008 comparison values and flags. This enabled the same 124-run screen cohort and a source-data comparison before the arrow-group check.