sciscape Publications
← All publications

Reef fish temperature index followed sea temperature across 2,781 Australian reef sites, but changed only 0.15 °C per °C year to year at 333 sites in 1992–2025, with lags and persistence

Question: does the community temperature index (CTI) of reef fish track sea surface temperature (SST) on Australian reefs, in space and in time? Approach: we used Reef Life Survey, ATRC and Parks Victoria Method 1 fish counts (31,187 surveys, 2,790 sites, 1992-2025). We calculated the species thermal index (STI) of 1,579 species from OBIS presence cells, without the RLS records, and NOAA OISST v2.1. CTI is the log-abundance-weighted mean STI. Survey SST is the OISST mean of the 12 months to the survey. We wrote the tests before we calculated CTI: spatial slope, year-to-year first differences, site trends, lag models and an out-of-sample test. Null models shuffle STI among species. Results: across sites, CTI followed SST with a slope of 0.94 (R2 0.94). At 333 sites with 8 or more survey years (mostly NSW, WA, Tasmania, Victoria and SA), CTI changed 0.15 C per C of SST change between surveyed years (95% CI 0.11-0.19; permutation p = 0.019). SST from 1-3 years before the survey predicted CTI as well as or better than current SST. The summed lag 0-5 coefficient was 0.51. Small fish responded in the same year; larger fish responded later. Mean CTI rose 0.21 C per decade and mean SST rose 0.20 C per decade, but sites that warmed more did not gain more CTI (across-site slope -0.43). In 2008-2025 at 179 sites, the CTI trend was 0.54 of the SST trend. At 42 Jurien Bay sites, CTI was 1.07 C (0.95-1.18) higher in 2015-2021 than in 1999-2009, after the 2011 marine heatwave, while SST at survey time was 0.31 C lower. A model trained on years to 2012 predicted CTI at 243 sites in 2013-2025 only 1.7% better than no change. Space-for-time and full-tracking predictions were 45-52% worse. Exploratory: cooling steps lowered CTI more (0.28) than warming steps raised it (0.05). Conclusion: reef fish composition matches SST in space, but its response in time is weak, delayed and path dependent. A match of mean long-term trends is not evidence of site-level tracking. Limitations: STI from OBIS has sampling bias and some wrong identifications (sensitivity versions agree). Divers are not identified in the public data. OISST does not resolve nearshore temperature. The panel is temperate and subtropical, not the Great Barrier Reef.

community temperature index · reef fish · Reef Life Survey · sea surface temperature · climate tracking · marine heatwave · Western Australia · Jurien Bay · tropicalization · species thermal index · OBIS · OISST · lagged response · hysteresis · out-of-sample prediction

Admitted 2 citing publications

References

16
  1. usesdoi:10.1038/sdata.2014.7

    Reef Life Survey method and data (Method 1 fish counts used here, AODN layer imos:ep_m1_public_data).

  2. usesIn current OBIS records, the equatorial dip in marine animal species richness did not deepen from 1955–1974 to 1995–2015; with equal effort in shared 1° cells it became shallower sci:sha256:351900751e57e67f7cb5ced24299fe6a00d0829ee52583d95ebb737285a43f8a

    Its retained OBIS presence aggregate (sha256-b607333b...) is the source of species thermal indices.

  3. usesdoi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0166.1

    NOAA OISST v2.1 sea surface temperature.

  4. supportsdoi:10.1111/ddi.12753

    Day et al. 2018 related reef fish CTI change to temperature in 2008-2015; we find a positive but weak year-to-year response, with lags, to 2025.

  5. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0631-5

    Ocean community warming responses and thermal affinities (Burrows et al. 2019).

  6. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05833-y

    Continent-wide declines of Australian shallow reef life over 2008-2021 (Edgar et al. 2023).

  7. supportsdoi:10.1126/science.aad8745

    Regime shift after the 2011 Western Australia heatwave; our Jurien Bay CTI step persisted to 2021 while SST returned below baseline.

  8. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2

    Claim that marine species track warming more closely than land species; our year-to-year reef fish CTI response is weak and our site trends do not follow site warming.

  9. doi:10.1038/nature16144

    Thermal biases of marine species (Stuart-Smith et al. 2015).

  10. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0353-x

    Realized thermal limits of shallow-water marine species (Stuart-Smith et al. 2017).

  11. doi:10.1038/nclimate1347

    CTI and climatic debt method (Devictor et al. 2012).

  12. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01934.x

    Overwinter survival of tropical fish in temperate waters; a possible mechanism of the cooling asymmetry.

  13. UK breeding bird community temperature index rose 0.015 °C per decade in 1994–2024, about one third of full tracking, but not more than with randomly shuffled species temperature indices sci:sha256:683861b94ea9bf5a95c3bb229e68ebbd1231ee722d8416ba96e503c2ffbd4bbe

    Same CTI tracking approach for UK breeding birds.

  14. Czech breeding bird community temperature index rose at 29% of full tracking in 1982–2024, but not more than with shuffled species values and not more where sites warmed more sci:sha256:b75c32633ae979145bba77671dca661bf69e33c2ec4d73a41109ef935f88e187

    Same CTI tracking approach for Czech breeding birds; also no stronger CTI rise where sites warmed more.

  15. UK butterfly transect communities did not shift to warm-niche species at the rate of 1976–2024 site warming, while thermal niche predicted year-to-year responses sci:sha256:a37a9927e8c25069416d317953a1c1943c4017f40a065b89c7de4187728e5393

    Same CTI tracking approach for UK butterflies.

  16. North American breeding-bird community temperature index fell in 1970–1996 and rose in 1997–2024 in all 30 tested BBS regions, at 25% of full tracking, but not more where June warming was larger sci:sha256:6a8e1da8f1a7e0d437f757e71aecaed395480e2280f2c33adc493e307ad75a1c

    Same CTI tracking approach for North American breeding birds.

Cited by

2 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.